The statement is inconsistent with the facts and can be changed, but strong evidence must be provided to overturn it. If it is the plaintiff and the contents of the complaint are incorrect, it may apply to the court for correction. If it is the defendant, the specific situation can be stated in the defense, and relevant evidence materials can be submitted during the trial. For matters that are not in line with the facts, the court will debate. The judge will determine the facts according to the evidence submitted by both parties. In order to avoid this situation, the interrogation record should be checked by the interrogated person and read out to those who can't read. If there are errors or omissions in the record, the person questioned shall be allowed to correct or supplement it, and shall be required to press the handprint at the modified place.

Procedures for handling administrative cases by public security organs

Article 77

The record of inquiry shall be checked by the person being questioned and read out to those who have no reading ability. If there are errors or omissions in the record, the person questioned shall be allowed to correct or supplement it, and shall be required to press the handprint at the modified place. After the interviewee confirms that the record is correct, he shall sign or fingerprint the inquiry record page by page. Refuse to sign and fingerprint, the people's police handling the case shall indicate it in the inquiry record.

The people's police handling the case shall sign the inquiry record, and the translator shall sign at the end of the inquiry record.

When inquiring, you can record and video the whole process, and keep the integrity of the recorded and video materials.