It is out of the question. If the patient can express himself, or if the doctor thinks he can sign himself and tell me all the circumstances, he can sign himself.

The purpose of signing is that the hospital will fulfill its obligation to inform patients of the medical measures to be taken next, or the necessity, risks and many other factors. If the patient signs, it means that he agrees with the hospital's surgical measures and is willing to take risks. In fact, the hospital is doing this to avoid medical disputes to the maximum extent.

However, regarding medical risks, if the hospital does make mistakes during the operation,

And finally confirmed by the medical malpractice appraisal Committee, even if it is signed, the hospital will bear the patient's liability for compensation. The so-called risks borne by patients can only be risks beyond the power of human resources, and hospitals have the responsibility to avoid the damage caused by negligence.

Therefore, the operation needs the signature of the patient himself or his immediate family. In fact, it is the hospital to avoid or reduce legal disputes. Only if you sign, will the hospital dare to operate.

Without the signature, many hospitals dare not operate for fear of medical disputes.

That's understandable.