Of course. It is the right of the parties to refuse to sign, but the failure of the parties to sign does not affect the effectiveness of the court's judgment. According to Article 77 of the Civil Procedure Law: "The service of litigation documents must have a receipt, and the addressee shall record the date of receipt on the receipt and sign or seal it. The date of receipt of the recipient on the receipt is the date of delivery. " But this does not mean that the effectiveness of the judgment depends on whether the addressee signs the service receipt. The failure of the parties to sign does not affect the effectiveness of the judgment. According to Article 147 of the Civil Procedure Law: "If a party refuses to accept the judgment of the local people's court of first instance, he has the right to appeal to the people's court at the next higher level within 15 days of the service of the judgment; if he refuses to accept the ruling of the local people's court of first instance, he has the right to appeal to the people's court at the next higher level within 10 days of the service of the judgment." If the written judgment or ruling cannot be served on the parties at the same time, the appeal period shall be counted from the day after they receive the written judgment or ruling. " The general court sued for divorce for the second time, and it is more likely to decide divorce. Failure to sign does not affect the validity of the judgment. The way of court service can be lien service or announcement service. Refuse to sign, can be directly stated in the referee's record. After the divorce legal documents come into effect, the marriage relationship is dissolved and the marriage certificate is invalid.

Legal objectivity:

Article 77 of the Civil Procedure Law requires a receipt for the service of litigation documents, and the addressee shall record the date of receipt on the receipt and sign or seal it. The date of receipt by the addressee on the service receipt shall be the date of service.