From the moment I saw this question, I felt that many answers were biased or unclear. As a result, there are really many questions in the exam. In fact, the question is "the gap is relatively small", not that amateurs have a great chance to beat this profession. The problem is that the gap is relatively small, that is, whether to lose or not, but still get a few points, and other sports opportunities are much less. I don't guarantee that table tennis is the "smallest" gap, but I think it is smaller than badminton and tennis. If there is a high-level badminton, amateur masters can get a point. (The company has what the provincial team saw before), but table tennis is hard to say, which is quite accidental.

The concept is not clear, which is not derogatory. Because table tennis is a national game, there are various echelons. It is not easy to distinguish amateurs from professionals. It is controversial to distinguish strength levels in some amateur competitions, but it is not absolute. As discussed in previous table tennis articles, amateurs usually have one or two tricks to approach or even surpass some professional players (perhaps just its shortcomings), but the comprehensive sum system is not as good as professional players, which not only kills, but also has some obvious weaknesses. If there is no chance in the amateur competition, but the single ball is normal, CCTV once made a video of a master of civil service. Xu Shaofa commented on one of the players' service and said, "It is better than Jiang Jialiang", but this amateur should not be able to beat Jiang Jialiang's service.

In addition to technique and play, state and seriousness are also important. If the first level can play the second level at will, it is not necessarily. Ma Lin once talked about his competition in the National Games and said that he had already met this competition. An unknown person, who didn't seriously consider tactics at first, relied on this feeling. As a result, the first game won 2 1: 19, the second game lost, and the third game was played seriously. Leading 13: 0, I have a similar game myself. Experienced, one team beat the provincial retreat, and the other team may think of winning by basic skills first. As a result, I was dragged into the deciding game, which was also 7: 5. Finally, the opponent began to make a forehand effort and lost.