The penalty conclusion has been decided and the referee’s report has come out. Different opinions on the penalty conclusion will vary. Repeatedly hyping such issues is not helpful to the order of the CBA league.

So what if it is reasonable or not? Have you never heard of this saying: If you say you can do it, you can do it, if you don’t do it you can do it, if you say you can’t do it you can’t do it, if you can do it you can’t do it, if you don’t accept it you can’t do it

He was kicked off the field because he was spitting out sweet things< /p>

It is quite unreasonable

First of all, it is determined that the ball was called a flop at the time and was given to a technical foul. It was ejected twice in total. It was not because of Simmons as many people said. If he refuses to accept the penalty, he gets up and scolds the referee (

First, the ball was played by Guo Ailun against Simmons. Let’s not talk about whether Guo Ailun committed a foul or not. First of all, Guo Ailun did not foul. I shot a three-pointer and I can’t fall to the ground. ? The center of gravity of the jumper is unstable. The competition is fierce and it is normal to fall to the ground.

The referee immediately called the whistle after Simmons fell to the ground. Note: And Simmons got up immediately. He was not lying on the ground rolling. I couldn't get up.

Is it outrageous?

Second, from the slow-motion replay, when Simmons’ shot landed, Guo Ailun and Simmons’ feet stumbled together, and the top of Guo Ailun’s arm was in contact with Simmons. There is a collision, is Guo Ailun suspected of violating Simmons' cylinder?

You tripped and I fell to the ground. How can you call me a flop? You don't call a defensive foul. Okay, okay, you call it Technical foul on Simmons?

Third, some people say that Simmons stretched his foot forward and deliberately hooked Guo Ailun's foot. This is a bit ridiculous. This action is too difficult, and Simmons' action is not at all Not big, just a normal shooting takeoff

Let’s take Simmons as he stretches his feet forward. That action is not enough to call an offensive foul. Even if it is a foul, if you give him an offensive foul, you will just give him a technical foul< /p>

Look at yesterday’s game between Shanghai and Shenzhen. Shanghai’s foreign player stretched his foot and it was only a foul.

Fourth, in such a crucial game in the playoffs, unless there is something special For excessive verbal actions, you can give him a technical foul. In the case of Simmons' ball, you actually gave him a technical foul. To save face, the referee made the penalty based on his emotions

And it is best to keep the scale consistent throughout the game. Shanxi and In the Guangzhou game, Guangzhou pushed people many times, and Chen Yingjun elbowed him. He didn't even give him a normal foul. Why did you give Simmons a technical foul?

Summary: No matter from which aspect, this is The penalties are too ridiculous. This is the playoffs. The players have been working hard for a year. Don’t do these dirty things because of the referee’s emotions.

Referee, how many times have you made misjudgments? Everyone can understand you and feel that You are human and it is inevitable to make mistakes. Simmons, who has not made any major mistakes, gave someone a technical foul, and he was in a hot state at the time

What I can guess is that the referee will retaliate emotionally. Simmons is ahead of him After complaining for a while, you gave someone a technical foul, and this technical foul was ejected. Everyone knew that you didn’t give Shanxi foreign aid a single technical foul. Was called for diving?

After repeatedly watching the video: the penalty was accurate, and the referee report of each game did not mention this call: This is enough to prove that the penalty was OK: watch the game: maintain a fair attitude: no color. Glasses: Simmons is a veteran on the court: The performance is too much: Let the performance speak for itself when playing: Reduce the performance: Fans want to see a fair draw: An intense, high-level game

League, basketball lantern game, the referee said After all, the report can be faked! 7

The video shows that the offensive player fell to the ground, stood up, and retreated in one go, with no unnecessary movements. The defensive player has also entered the next game action. This pursuit of the body is really unreasonable!

Maybe you still haven’t figured out why Simmons was called for a technical foul. It seems that he just followed the trend and raised such a question, right?

According to repeated viewing of the video, after Simmons fell to the ground after shooting, the referee's first gesture was a "get up" action, not a "T" action. I really don’t understand whether some people really don’t understand football, or they do it intentionally, or they are used to being black for the sake of being black, or they are deliberately using the traffic of the Liaoning Men’s Basketball Team to create hype.

It is true that Simmons' exaggerated action when shooting was considered to be a deliberate foul. However, the referee did not make any penalty at the time and only signaled Simmons to get up and continue the game. It may be that Simmons believed that the ball was fouled, so he stood up and said something to the referee (we don't know exactly what it was), and the referee gave him a technical foul because of this.

Even if it was actually recorded as a flop, was it the referee who made up the call after Simmons complained? Is it abnormal to challenge the referee's authority on the field and be called for a foul? Or is it only abnormal when playing in Liaoning? You should figure this out.

If the referee really made a misjudgment, the referee's report after the game would have been uproarized by interested people. For example, in the last 30 seconds of the second game between Shanghai and Shenzhen, Wang Zhelin fouled Gu Quan while rushing for an offensive rebound. Yan Jun, the referee on duty at the bottom line, did not whistle the penalty. Didn't the referee's report indicate this missed call? If Simmons made a misjudgment that time, it should have been exposed long ago.

Liaoning has always been the subject of "care" by the referees headed by Yan Jun. When did the tide turn? Can Liaoning get the referee bonus?

Something wrong!