1. The lessee has the right to sign a contract, but the joint lessee generally has no right to sign a contract;

Public housing demolition, the demolition office and the lessee signed the "Housing Demolition Compensation Agreement", the lessee is responsible for the resettlement of residents, and the demolition office does not negotiate with the residents. Because there is only one tenant and many people may live together, it is difficult for the demolition office to reach a satisfactory agreement with many people. After signing the agreement, the demolition office will ignore the disputes between the lessee and the roommate. If the lessee and roommate fail to negotiate, the court can only make a judgment through litigation. Unless the lessee dies, a new lessee is not identified and the needy households enjoy the protection, it is possible to require the same tenant to sign a contract.

2. The lessee has the right to enjoy multiple demolition compensation, and the joint lessee can only enjoy it once in principle.

According to the law, the lessee's right to compensation for demolition is not restricted. If the lessee has more than one set of public houses in this city, he can get the right to compensation for demolition. However, people who live together have already enjoyed compensation for demolition or welfare housing distribution (including welfare housing distribution under the planned economy and welfare housing distribution funded by themselves). ), so you can no longer enjoy the compensation for demolition. Of course, this only refers to welfare housing distribution. If it is a commercial house purchased by yourself, it is not restricted.

3. In the litigation of dividing the demolition funds decided by the court, because public houses are generally obtained for the reasons of tenants, tenants have made great contributions to the house, so the proportion of joint tenants in judicial practice will be slightly higher than that of residents.