With the end of the 20 19 self-inspection operation, it is very likely that all localities will list various problems as frequently as they do, so as to declare war on registration and certification. Therefore, it is more and more difficult to make profits by hanging certificates in the future. The trend is basically towards the integration of people and evidence. There is only one way to say that the builder belongs, that is, the certificate and social security are together. Let's talk about the risks of a first-class builder today.

First, the project quality and safety risks. In the case of implementing the first-class construction engineer's affiliation, if you choose the method of certificate affiliation, the risk to registered construction engineers will be much greater.

. After all, once a new construction project of a construction company has a quality accident, in other words, a safety accident of a safety level, even if the registered construction engineer himself is not on site to supervise the construction, the registered construction engineer should bear the corresponding obligations and may cancel his practice certificate, and some serious cases will be punished by laws and regulations.

Second, the risks arising from the company's default. Although both parties can get some benefits when the first-class constructor is registered with the construction company, the contractual relationship between them is not protected by laws and regulations. If the construction company does not pay the ancillary fees according to the price agreed before, there is no way to guarantee some legal rights of registered builders. Even if an agreement is signed, the agreement is not easily protected by laws and regulations, and there is no legal recognition.

Third, the certificate itself brings some risks. For a first-class constructor, it is necessary to complete a continuing education cycle every three years. Although there is no mandatory requirement for a performance certificate in the current national policy, it does not mean that there will be no such requirement in the future. If the new policy of continuing education for first-class builders requires proof of performance in the future, and the builders themselves violate the rules, they may not be able to continue their practice through continuing education.

These are the three major risks of first-class builders compiled and released by Bian Xiao. I hope that the certified personnel will pay attention to and cherish their feathers. The introduction of "four stores and one platform" is related to governance. If the "First Construction" must play a role, there is only one way, stop the social security of your work unit and pay the social security by the affiliated company. There is no other way. All your documents should be put in one company. Don't try to break the law. When the time comes, it will be too late for the builder to directly void your grades and regret it. Remember.