1, there are two "secrets" in learning Chinese: first, don't read Chinese books; Second, don't treat it as a document.
This is the most emotional sentence of Han Han. Adding double quotation marks in front of the secret shows that Han Han is still a little self-aware. What he means is that what he said is not a real secret. "One is not to read China; Second, it is not regarded as a document. " This is a rebellious and angry statement with a serious child temper. What books to read without reading Chinese books when learning Chinese? A math book? If you don't treat it as a document, you will probably read a book after class. If you don't look at both, it's hard to imagine how good his Chinese grades can be. However, if you think about it carefully, you can find that this sentence has some flavor. Chinese knowledge can't be learned only from Chinese books (he means Chinese textbooks). Chinese is not only the basic knowledge of Chinese and the knowledge of works creation, but also the central idea of the article. Chinese is not only valuable in learning basic knowledge, but also has learned a lot in being a man and doing things. Chinese is not a single subject, so you don't have to study in a Chinese book.
As for whether it's a document or not, I think it's Han Han's anger. Take Wan Li Road and read thousands of books, which is the way of studying left by the ancients. Only eating too much will kill people. I have never heard that reading too many books will kill people. Perhaps Han Han has another meaning here, that is, the purpose of learning Chinese is to be able to write independently, to be wise, to think independently and to have their own opinions. However, if you read too many of these things in the composition book, it will inevitably be bound by the framework of the so-called excellent model essay, and it will inevitably lead to dependence, either imitation or copying, and it is difficult to have your own things. However, this statement is ridiculous. Draw lessons from other people's things for reference. Looking at other people's things depends on the ability to understand. If you want to be good at thinking, why do you have to copy them? You don't have your own opinion, do you?
I have my own principles when reading. I don't like Chinese books and composition classes because I hate them to make money and stifle people's personality and creativity.
Those who say these things have poisonous eyes. Han Han is modest, which is his view and principle. I don't like Chinese books and composition classes, because hating them makes him make money and stifles his personality and creativity. According to this boy, no matter who earned the money from China students, according to him, students' personality and creativity were stifled. You really should spank him. No matter how bad things in Chinese books are, they won't kill people's personality and creativity, will they?
3. A student sent me a test paper, in which a question was analyzed by my article. He asked me if my article was selected from the following competitions: a: the first national new concept composition competition; B, the first national new concept composition contest; C: The First National New Concept Composition Competition. What the hell do you think this is! What is the purpose of the exam? Our education in China is really great!
This is Han Han's most ironic remark about Chinese teaching in China. I think this question seems to be a preliminary intelligence test for some people who are suspected to be "mentally unsound", but the clever questioner has given a very retarded question. Is it that the questioner deliberately made such a ridiculous question? Does the questioner like this mentally retarded game? Otherwise, I have seen the stubborn Chinese teaching mode in China in recent decades, and I have seen the ancient style of Chinese teaching. If the questioner is serious and intends to test the students' judgment and recognition ability in this way, it will be really convincing. As for the multiple-choice questions above, the questioner asked the students to find the most standard answer, and let me do it, that is, ABC chose any one correctly. Obviously, this kind of question has no value at all. I really don't know what it is, but I feel that I have been teased and fooled. For example, someone asked Yin Qian who was in the class. Yin Qian made an answer. Please choose the correct one from the following three answers: A: I am Yin Qian; B, Yin Qian is me; I'm Yin Qian. Answering this kind of test questions is a waste of time and feelings, which is not only meaningless, but also makes people look as disgusting as accidentally swallowing a fly.
The hero of my novel basically has nothing to do, so he lives in chaos. This is life. Why must it be higher than life?
Han Han's handwriting is messy. The material of the novel comes from life rather than life, which is an academic topic in novel creation. Han Han is talking about two concepts. The purpose of the novel is to give people spiritual food and guide people to a better life, or the writer is a life scientist and he is a mentor of life. Han Han means that his novels are written as they are, true, without any whitewashing and affectation, and still live out their true colors.
Above life is to guide life.
It can also be no higher than life, and words can record all the real life of people.
However, if the novel can't be higher than life, it will lose the charm of the work, just like a person has lost his soul and has no value at all.
I wonder if Han Han realizes that both the hero in his novel and the whole novel are above life.
5, mathematics, I think I only need to go to the second grade. It is certainly good for a person to develop in an all-round way, but the more comprehensive he is, the more mediocre he may be. It is said that learning advanced mathematics is to cultivate logical ability. I think logical ability is innate, not acquired. Didn't the ancients learn advanced mathematics and have no logical ability?
That's because Han Han has no intention of engaging in high-tech career or becoming a mathematician in the future. In this way, the knowledge of mathematics in Grade Two is enough. You don't need so many complicated numbers at ordinary times. I never use equations when shopping or buying food, and I don't need proof. I study math solely for exams.
"It is certainly good for a person to develop in an all-round way, but the more comprehensive it may be, the more mediocre it will be." This sentence is a bit interesting. Han Han first affirmed that "a person's all-round development is of course good", and suddenly came to a turning point, "but the more all-round development, the more mediocre", which is not very certain. The meaning is clear, that is, all-round development may not necessarily produce talents, on the contrary, it may produce a useless mediocrity. This is a one-sided statement. I certainly hope to develop in an all-round way, but I don't have the ability to develop in an all-round way. I can't be proficient in everything. It is better to specialize in one subject than to develop in an all-round way. However, I don't think "all-round development" seems to be recognized by Han Han. The educational policy of cultivating students' all-round development in morality, intelligence, physique, beauty and labor put forward by China Education does not conflict with success. I think all-round development is a major reform of education in China in recent years. It is an innovative educational concept followed and practiced by current education, which deserves our support, appreciation and support.
Perhaps Han Han's "all-round development" means something else. I guess it means "proficient in all 18 martial arts" According to this understanding, his words become quite reasonable. A person can't master everything, it's not a person, maybe it's a god. We all know that people can't be perfect, and we constantly realize that it is enough to do only one thing and do it well.
It is wrong to say that logical ability is innate. Normal people understand logic, but if they want to talk about logical ability, they really need to be cultivated, otherwise they can't say they have logical ability. "The ancients didn't learn advanced mathematics, didn't they have logical ability?" This sentence is logical reasoning, and the conclusion is that the ancients did not learn advanced mathematics, which does not mean that they did not have logical ability. I am also thinking about this problem, but I still feel that there is fraud, but I just don't know the crux. It seems that I am a person without logical ability first.
May I ask? It is said that people eat meat for nutrition. I think people can get nutrition without eating meat. Cattle don't eat meat but eat grass. Isn't it very nutritious?
Why do you think cows that eat grass are more nutritious than people who eat meat?
Right and wrong, I leave it to readers to comment, and I have nothing to say.
6. Seven red lights illuminate my future.
If it is for him personally, I think Han Han's sentence is true. The red light not only illuminates his future, but also greatly illuminates his future.
7. Failure in thought and morality is better than not thinking at all.
Han Han is completely confused. These are two concepts. Ideological and moral failure is a problem with people's ideological and moral character, which has nothing to do with whether they have thoughts or not.
A thoughtful person is not necessarily good in ideology and morality, and a good person in ideology and morality is not necessarily a thoughtful person.
8. I am a piece of Shanghai gold, and I will make many people reflect on themselves.
I think so, too, but did you say that your Han Han is gold? I also said that my Yin Qian is a diamond.
You really made many people reflect on themselves. On the contrary, they saw you clearly.
However, Mr. Wang advises you not to let others reflect all the time. In life, it is beneficial to reflect on yourself often.
9. It's hard to sum up your personality. I especially dislike those rigid personalities. I just do what I like. I don't want to follow the crowd. I can't write such a thing as "Ah, our splendid bridge".
Personality is a good thing, no one has his own feelings and hobbies, and has his own thoughts and pursuits; Everyone has his own outlook on life and values.
We all do things in the way we like, so we don't have to stick to too many rules and regulations.
10, I have a thoughtful plan for the arrangement after dropping out of school. In May, I promoted the publication of Triple Door in Shanghai, signed books among my peers, and went to Tibet with several companions in the summer vacation ... I shut myself up at home in the last few months and wrote down my experience for one year.
Therefore, you still have a long way to go, and you should have a good planning arrangement for your life.
There is a saying in the countryside: the years are good, but the days are sad. The past has become history, and what you face is the challenge of the future!
Han Han, whoever laughs last will win the real victory.
-There are many photos of his life in this space below.