Generally speaking, petitioners will not bear legal responsibility, but it is suggested not to repeat petitions, which will be rejected by higher authorities. Repeated letters and visits refer to the behavior that the same complainant puts forward the same letters and visits twice or more in a certain period of time. The parties can solve the problems they face through court proceedings, but letters and visits do not solve the problems.

First, in order to further strengthen the supervision and management of letters and visits, these Provisions are formulated.

On-site supervision of letters and visits shall be uniformly planned, organized and implemented, and a supervision mechanism with clear responsibilities, standardized coordination, orderliness, pragmatism and efficiency shall be established.

The supervision room is responsible for coordinating and organizing the supervision and supervision of letters and visits, mainly: summarizing and compiling the work plan, organizing and implementing it, mastering the results of supervision and supervision, and comprehensively analyzing and reporting the supervision and supervision work.

Two, in line with the following conditions of letters and visits, the petition department shall be transferred to the right to review the agency:

(a) the administrative organ has made a complaint handling (review) opinion and served it on the complainant;

(two) the complainant refuses to accept the handling (review) opinion;

(3) The demands put forward by the petitioners are basically consistent with those in the handling (review) opinions.

Third, repeat the petition review procedure

(1) transfer. Refuses to accept the opinions on handling letters and visits, and letters and visits at all levels in the province occur, and the letters and visits department shall refer them to the review institution; Letters and visits to Beijing occur and are referred to the review agency that refuses to accept the review opinions.

(2) interview. After receiving the petitions, the review institution shall interview the petitioner, listen to the petitioner's statement on the basic situation of the petitions, and understand the reasons, basis and specific review request of the petitioner who refuses to accept the handling (review) opinions. During the meeting, a transcript of the conversation shall be made and signed by the interviewer, the recorder and the interviewer.

(3) acceptance. Within 3 days from the date of the formation of the transcript of the conversation, the review institution shall issue a notice of acceptance to the petitioner; Submit a notice of defense to the original processing (review) organ.

Legal basis:

Petition regulations

Article 16

If the complainant puts forward the complaint reporting matters in the form of a visit, he shall put it forward to the organ at the same level or at the next higher level that has the right to handle it according to law; If the petition has been accepted or is being handled, and the complainant puts forward the same petition to the superior organ of the accepting and handling organ within the prescribed time limit, the superior organ will not accept it.