Report on alleged fraud of collusion between Wang Yi and Wu Heng: Baiyun, female, born on XX, XX, 1972, Han nationality, employee of XX company in XX city, living in XX yard of XX road in XX city. Tel:131xxxxxxxx Suspect: Wang Yi, male, born on xx, X, 1972, Han nationality, living in XX Village, XX Township, XX County, XX City, Henan Province. Suspect: Wu Heng, male, born on XX, XX, 1979, Han nationality, driver, address: XX Village, XX Township, XX County, XX City, Henan Province, and telephone number: 137XXXXXXXX. 1. Wang Yi fabricated the loan facts, concealed the truth, maliciously prosecuted, and attempted to defraud130,000 yuan for the purpose of illegal possession, which constituted the crime of fraud. On March 27th, 2007, Wang Yi sued me (the informant) in the People's Court of XX District, XX City, demanding that I return the loan of130,000 yuan. I am deeply surprised! Up to now, I have no idea who this man is, let alone borrow money from him. And my complaint that I need money badly in business is even more false. I have my own fixed job, how can I have time and energy to do business? I have a steady income, so I can't do business naturally. Why should I borrow huge sums of money to take risks? Besides, I want to borrow money. I have parents, brothers and so many relatives, all of whom are rich. Will I borrow money from someone who has no relatives and no reason? In addition, if the agreed interest is one point, why not indicate it on the loan note, but verbally agree? Wang Yi fabricated the loan facts and deceived the court in an attempt to defraud130,000 yuan. His behavior fully meets the constitutive requirements of fraud, and he should be investigated for criminal responsibility according to law. Second, Wang Yi was instructed by Wu Heng and conspired to defraud. Wu Heng must have an ulterior "agreement" with Wang Yi, and the IOU that Wang Yi sued for must come from Wu Heng, because I once wrote an IOU of130,000 for Wu Heng's divorce. The story goes like this: Wu Heng and I had a short marriage, and we went through the registration formalities abruptly before we got married (the marriage certificate was 65438+165438+ 10 on June 2006). The marriage was opposed by the whole family, and my family wanted me to divorce Wu Heng in order to sever the kinship. I was forced to maintain my family relationship and didn't want to lose my kinship, so I negotiated a divorce with Liu. I said without thinking, "Sure, how much is it? 65438+ million lines? " He said: "654.38+ 10,000 is not very similar, add a fraction, 654.38+0.3 million." Just kidding, I wrote an IOU of130,000 according to his request. I don't remember the exact date clearly, maybe it was the day of the divorce. ) We went through the divorce procedure on February 17, 2006, so we got divorced after getting married for more than a month and lived together after the divorce. Ten days later (February 29th, 2006), I regretted typing the IOUs, so I asked him for IOUs, but Liu refused to give them on the grounds that they were lost. I said, "If you lose it, give me a receipt, or we will break up now." On the same day, he personally wrote me a receipt of 1.3 million yuan, signed it, and pressed four handprints with his right index finger. A few days later, he deliberately asked me to find the "IOU" and deliberately tore it in front of me on the spot. For this reason, let me return the receipt to him. I thought he wouldn't be stingy enough to leave a real iou, so I returned the original to him (I made a copy, see Annex 1) and he destroyed it on the spot. In the last few months with Liu, I found him lazy, unprofessional and heavily in debt, so I ended my cohabitation with him in August 2006. At this time, he called me to make up with him, and I refused. At the end of June 2007, 65438+ 10, he threatened me with debts and asked a lawyer (like Xiaohui) to negotiate with me about the debts of130,000. I refuse to mediate because the loan fact does not exist at all. I called him later, but I couldn't find him. One day in February, he called me voluntarily. I want to know what he thinks, so I recorded the conversation with my mobile phone (see Annex 2). This recording can prove that the "IOU" is between Wu Heng and me, and it has nothing to do with Wang Yi, so the IOU is not true. On April 10, 2007, I received a summons from the court, only to know that Wu Heng had conspired with Wang Yi in the name of Wang Yi, because no one would believe that he could give me130,000 in his own name (as far as I know, he owed money to his uncle, his aunt and his friend Shang XX and their village before we got married). The above facts prove that Wu Heng and Wang Yi fabricated the loan facts and concealed the truth, with the purpose of illegally possessing huge amounts of property, with the intention of deceiving the court and defrauding huge amounts of property. This is a conspiracy between Wu Heng and Wang Yi, a criminal act of conspiracy and partnership fraud. I request your bureau to file a criminal case for investigation to safeguard legal dignity and citizens' legitimate property rights. To XX District Public Security Bureau of XX City: Baiyun (my signature) XX, 2007.