Let's talk about the sharing of elevator expenses: Generally speaking, all the people who require to install elevators should be old communities, because the elevators were not designed at the beginning, or the floors were lower than the sixth floor, and then for everyone's convenience, everyone will share the elevator expenses equally, but this involves a question, that is, whether everyone is willing to share the expenses equally. The residents on the first floor are most entangled, because they feel that this is of little practical significance to themselves, so they face this problem as the first floor.
First, do you have any needs for elevators?
As for the elevator, it belongs to public facilities, that is to say, it is shared by everyone, so since it is shared by everyone, they may use the elevator on the first floor or the top floor. Since you want to use the elevator, you have to bear the cost. Maybe a resident on the first floor said I don't need the elevator, but can you promise that I won't use it all the time? If you visit a family or go upstairs to do something, then you may also use this elevator, so I think it is a bit reluctant to say that the residents on the first floor don't need an elevator.
Second, is it necessary to install an elevator?
I said above whether individuals use elevators. Next, I want to talk about whether it is necessary to install an elevator. I think this is very important. Generally speaking, elevators are installed to meet everyone's convenience, but is it necessary to install elevators for convenience? Personally, I think it depends on the actual situation. Some communities are suitable and some are not. It is actually a waste to install elevators in those old communities. Maybe you just installed an elevator, and this community may have to be demolished again. It doesn't make sense to install elevators in such communities, but I suggest that residents on the first floor treat them rationally. There are many old people and children upstairs, so it is really difficult for these people to go upstairs and downstairs. As a resident on the first floor, you can support it.
Third, share the cost reasonably according to the benefits of the elevator.
Sometimes, as a resident on the first floor, the demand for elevators is really low, and the main beneficiaries are from the fourth floor to the sixth floor, so I think the cost of this elevator should be shared equally according to the benefits. To tell the truth, you can't let a user who doesn't use the elevator often or at all on the first floor bear the same cost as a resident who uses the elevator frequently. This is totally unfair. Personally, I think the residents on the first floor will bear 5% of the elevator fee, and the residents on the second floor will bear 10%.
Fourth, does everyone support installing elevators?
Installing an elevator is really convenient for everyone, but the cost of installing an elevator is not small. This has to be discussed by the residents of the whole building and the property management department. If everyone agrees to pretend, that's fine, but if most people don't want to pretend, I don't think it's necessary to force it. The installation of elevators is not mandatory, and users on the first floor cannot be forced to sign upstairs. As a resident on the first floor, you can choose not to sign. This is your right, but the possible consequences.
As I said above, the residents on the first floor will share the cost of installing the elevator. Then I will talk about another situation, that is, the roots of the residents on the first floor do not agree to install the elevator. It doesn't matter if the money is divided equally. Because installing elevators in residential areas requires everyone's consent, as long as one person does not agree, it cannot be carried out. According to Article 97 of the Property Law, according to a * * *? Property repair requires more than two-thirds consent, and? * * * with * *? The building needs the consent of all the owners, and the installation of elevators should belong to * * * and should be approved by all the owners in the building, so as long as one party does not agree, it cannot be carried out. Why are residents on the first floor unwilling to install elevators? In fact, it mainly includes the following aspects:
Number one? Affect your daily life.
Installing the elevator is a big project, not to say that it can be completed in a day or two, but it will take several months at the earliest. In the process of construction, installing an elevator will bring many unfavorable factors, such as noise, security risks, lighting downstairs, etc., which will directly affect the quality of life of residents on the first floor.
Secondly, it affects the value of the floor itself.
Once the elevator is installed on the top floor, the superiority of the low-rise residents will not disappear immediately. Originally, the conditions for their appreciation would suddenly become the factors for their depreciation. It can be said that installing elevators is not good for them, so residents on the first floor are definitely reluctant to install elevators.
Final conclusion: Personally, I think it is better to install this elevator according to the overall situation. If it will not affect your own interests and has a certain public welfare nature, then I suggest that you can still sign it. If it affects your own interests, you should think carefully. Installing an elevator is not a trivial matter. In fact, people themselves are not so selfless. They are all selfish, so we don't have to learn from saints. We can sign anything that is beneficial to us, which really affects our own interests. Then you can choose not to sign it. There is no need to be morally bound on it. Maybe everyone has a different opinion. I wonder what my friends think of this.