Deng Qinghua, director of the Science and Technology Bureau of Changning City, Hengyang City, failed to supervise and neglect his duty for seven times

Since I formally petitioned the No.2 Cement Plant of Changning City to retire for my mother on January 1, 22, it has been nearly five months. As the competent unit of the No.2 Cement Plant of Hengyang City, the Science and Technology Bureau has resorted to fraud and set up cards to make things difficult, and

it has just pushed three obstacles and refused to accept it. At the meeting, Wu Jiannan, director of the Letters and Calls Office of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology, revealed to us without hesitation:

If you want to have good benefits in Changning No.2 Cement Plant, a state-owned enterprise, and if you want to become a regular worker as soon as possible, the most important thing is to deal with the relationship with the factory director, give more gifts and curry favor with the factory director, and handle the relationship well. Some jobs turned positive within a month or two, but the relationship was not handled well. Some jobs were difficult to become a regular worker after seven or eight years, or even more than ten years. Later, Deng Yongjun, deputy director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology, saw that we didn't accept their "let it go" treatment, and became angry and threatened us on the spot, and threatened that if we continued to petition, my future work would be in trouble. (as evidenced by the recording).

As the director of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology, Deng Qinghua, his subordinates are so blatantly preaching bureaucracy, intimidating petitioners and obstructing citizens from petitioning for rights protection. This is one of the poor supervision, oversight and dereliction of duty of Deng Qinghua, the director of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology.

Secondly, on January 19th, 22, Wu Jiannan, director of the Letters and Calls Office of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology, and He Xiaowei, a clerk, actually faked my signature to sign the first reply opinion issued by the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology that "I can't prepare it and close the case hastily" (the signing date of the forged signature is January 17th, 22), and the Letters and Calls Office of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology deceives the superior and deceives the inferior- This is the second time that Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Communication, failed to supervise and neglect his duty.

Up to now, the petition office of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology has not seen any formal handling documents for the illegal and disciplinary acts of forging petitioners' signatures. At the same time, the rhetoric in this first reply from the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Communication is mainly the rhetoric used to shirk responsibility at the meeting on January 1, which is unacceptable.

Thirdly, after the forged petitioners' signatures were exposed in the Letters and Calls Office of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology, on January 23rd, 22, Wu Jiannan, director of the Letters and Calls Office of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology, presided over and He Xiaowei, a clerk, recorded that Zhou Guocheng, the secretary of the Second Cement Plant of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology, together with Lei Guicheng, Chen Deli, Chang Ming Deng, Tang Chuanzhi and Liu Youcheng, jointly committed perjury. They made a lie out of nothing and slandered my mother because they gave birth to a third child before April 1981 and were expelled from the second cement plant in the city.

Facts speak louder than words. It will be a shame for them to publicly commit perjury. We have the household registration certificate of the local police station: my sister was born in February 198, and I was born in March 1981. My sister was born in 1982 after my mother was suspended from work for nearly a year.

This investigation report on perjury was posted on the provincial petition platform by the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology. Especially after perjury was exposed, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Industry and Information Technology tried to excuse the scandal with a sentence: "The time is as long as forty years, and the time node is not accurately grasped." This is the third time that Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology, failed in supervision and oversight.

fourthly, after the completion of this investigation report on perjury, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Communication couldn't wait to give us the second reply opinion on January 25th. In this second reply, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology first excused the petition office from forging the petitioners' signatures, and characterized their forgery as "the delivery procedure was not in place". Later, it was asserted that I was expelled from the Second Cement Plant in April 1981 for violating the family planning to have a third child.

Based on the obvious perjury, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Communication hastily issued a second reply to us without any investigation and verification, regardless of the legitimate rights and interests of the petitioners and the social impact. This is the fourth oversight and dereliction of duty of Deng Qinghua, the director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Communication.

Fifth, on March 2, 22, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information issued the third reply to us. In this third reply, around the three questions we mentioned, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information continued to quibble and justify itself:

1. The Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information continued to believe that I was expelled from the Second Cement Plant in April 1981 for violating the family planning policy.

2. The Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology claimed that the petition office forged the petitioner's signature, which was being investigated and handled by Changning Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection. In fact, until May 2, 22, the petitioners had not seen any formal handling documents of the Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision on the forgery of the petitioners' signatures by the petition offices.

3. In view of the perjury-investigation report investigated and collected by the Letters and Calls Office of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology on January 23, 22, the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology exonerated Wu Jiannan and He Xiaowei from the suspicion of * * * * crime and collusion.

In our opinion, the three problems mentioned by the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Communication in this third reply have not been effectively solved, but they are obvious in shattered glass. As for other crimes and one-sided words, they are naturally broken.

since this third reply opinion, which is totally unrealistic and only shirks responsibility, was approved by Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology, and sent out, it is the fifth negligence and dereliction of duty of Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology.

Maybe they themselves realized the absurdity of this third reply, which led to the fourth reply that attracted much attention.

Sixth, on May 7, 22, when Yi Fengsheng and Deng Honghua of the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology sent the fourth reply letter directly issued by the Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology, regardless of the specific content of the reply letter, they threw the fourth reply letter directly on the ground, and then walked away. Their attitude was extremely bad and unprofessional. Their attitude towards the petitioners really damaged the image of Changning organs and units. This is the poor supervision of Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Industry and Information Technology.

Seventh, on May 7, 22, the fourth reply letter sent by the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information Technology finally met the world on the ground, which was obviously contradictory and shattered glass. In this fourth reply, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Information has fabricated a new conclusion: it is said that my mother was terminated in March 1981 (note that they said this time in March 1981) because of family planning problems. Older people all know that in 1981, if the first child was a family that gave birth to a daughter, they could have another child. At that time, there was no compulsion to have only one child, and families with two children were the vast majority. As for my sister, she was born after being suspended from work for nearly a year, which has nothing to do with the reason why my mother was suspended from work. Moreover, according to what they said, in March of the Gregorian calendar in 1981, my second child was not yet born. At that time, my mother had only one daughter. Where did she get illegal family planning? How was the employment contract terminated? This is the seventh oversight and dereliction of duty of Deng Qinghua, director of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Industry and Information Technology.

Up to now, the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Communication has issued four reply opinions successively, and has also made four shameful little moves. Apart from practicing fraud and setting up checkpoints to make things difficult,

it is just pushing three obstacles and refusing to accept them.

As the head of the Municipal Bureau of Science, Technology and Communication, Deng Qinghua has failed in supervision and oversight for seven times. What is his conscience?