Legal analysis: (1) check. In other words, it is for the interviewee to see, and the interviewee verifies whether his questions and answers are objectively and accurately recorded. If the interviewee is unable to read or is inconvenient to read, the interviewee is illiterate or illiterate; Or if the person being interrogated is blind or suffering from other diseases and cannot read, the interrogator shall read the transcript to him. When reading to it, you should be complete and accurate, and you should not read only part of it or read it selectively. (2) It is a supplement and amendment. After checking, the inquirer thinks that there are omissions or errors in the records, and he may request to supplement or correct them, and the inquirer shall supplement or correct them. The recorder should generally record the respondents' answers truthfully, but it is not required to record the interviewees' original words verbatim. In the practice of handling cases, the order and terms of the respondents' answers can be adjusted and summarized appropriately, but they must fully and accurately reflect the respondents' meaning. Facts irrelevant to the case shall not be recorded. If it really belongs to what should be recorded but not recorded, or the meaning of the interviewee is not correctly recorded, it should be supplemented after being questioned and the mistakes should be corrected. (3) Signature and seal. If the transcript is verified to be correct, or there are omissions or errors that have been corrected, the person questioned shall sign the transcript. If the questioned person can't write, he can also stamp it. If you can't write and don't have a seal, you can press your handprint where the recorder indicates your name. This situation should be regarded as signature or seal. The people's police who inquire shall also sign the record. When making supplements and corrections, the interviewee should press the fingerprint. This not only shows that the inquirer and the interviewee are responsible for the contents of the record, but also prevents the tampering and forgery of the inquiry record.

Legal basis: Article 82 of the Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) on Public Security Punishment requires that those who violate public security administration be summoned for investigation. With the approval of the person in charge of the case-handling department of the public security organ, a summons card shall be used for summoning. The people's police may summon an offender found on the spot who violates the administration of public security orally after producing his work certificate, but it shall be indicated in the inquiry record.

Article 54 of the Provisions on Procedures for Handling Administrative Cases in People's Republic of China (PRC), if a summons card is used for summons, the illegal suspect shall fill in the arrival and departure time on the summons card, and sign it after being summoned to the case, inquired and verified. Refusing to fill in or sign, the people's police handling the case shall indicate it on the summons card.