After recording the confession, if it is really inconsistent with the facts, it can generally be changed. However, if you were suspected of recanting or making a false confession before, you need to bear legal responsibility. Confession should conform to the facts, and false confession should bear legal responsibility. If the statement is inconsistent with the facts, you have to bear the related adverse consequences. Reasonable retraction is not only the need to protect the legal defense rights of criminal suspects and defendants, but also the need to find out the facts of the case. Therefore, the investigation and judicial organs should correctly treat the confessions of criminal suspects and defendants. The confessions of criminal suspects and defendants can neither be simply and generally denied, nor can they be easily affirmed regardless of the facts of the case and other sufficient and conclusive evidence found. When handling cases, public security organs and judicial organs must adhere to the principles of seeking truth from facts, emphasizing evidence, emphasizing investigation and research, and not trusting confessions. The confession can only be used as evidence after verification. If there is only a confession and no other evidence, the defendant cannot be found guilty. In the process of investigation, public security usually has three case facts. ~ Four audits confirmed the truth of confession, even more. Therefore, once signed and confirmed, every criminal interrogation record is difficult to modify and will be kept as evidence. However, if the criminal suspect needs to be supplemented or changed in other aspects, the prosecutor can supplement it in the new record at the next public security/arraignment.

Legal objectivity:

The Supreme People's Court Criminal Procedure Law&; ampgt； Interpretation of related issues Article 82 If the interrogation record has the following defects, it can be adopted after correction or reasonable explanation; If it is impossible to make corrections or make reasonable explanations, it shall not be used as the basis for finalizing the case: (1) interrogation time, interrogators, record takers, legal representatives, etc. There are errors or contradictions in the interrogation record; (2) The interrogators did not sign; (3) The transcript of the first interrogation fails to record the relevant rights and legal provisions of the interrogated person. Article 122 of the Criminal Procedure Law, when making interrogation records, it shall be handed over to the criminal suspect for verification, and those who are unable to read shall be read out to him. If there are omissions or errors in the record, the criminal suspect may make additions or corrections. The criminal suspect shall sign or seal his name after admitting that it is correct in the record. Investigators should also sign the records. If a criminal suspect requests to write his own confession, it shall be allowed. When necessary, investigators may also ask the criminal suspect to write a confession in person.