Legal analysis: in principle, the judicial expertise of judicial expertise institutions can not be falsified, because China has a corresponding judicial expertise system, and the appraisers are responsible for it. According to the provisions of this system, judicial expertise fraud is subject to legal responsibility. However, it does not rule out that some people violate the relevant regulations, resulting in untrue judicial appraisal results. 1, the expert responsibility system is implemented in judicial expertise. The appraiser shall conduct the appraisal independently, be responsible for the appraisal opinions, and sign or seal the appraisal book. Many people participate in the appraisal, and if there are different opinions on the appraisal opinions, it shall be indicated. 2, appraisers and authentication institutions engaged in judicial authentication business, should abide by laws and regulations, abide by professional ethics and professional discipline, respect science, abide by the technical operation norms. 3. If the appraiser or appraisal institution violates the provisions of this decision, it shall be given a warning by the judicial administrative department of the provincial people's government and ordered to make corrections. In any of the following circumstances, the judicial administrative department of the provincial people's government shall give a punishment of stopping engaging in judicial authentication business for more than three months and less than one year; If the circumstances are serious, the registration will be cancelled: (1) Seriously irresponsible, causing great losses to the legitimate rights and interests of the parties; (2) Providing false documents or defrauding registration by other fraudulent means; (3) Refusing to testify in court after being notified by the people's court according to law; (4) Other circumstances stipulated by laws and administrative regulations. If the appraiser intentionally makes a false appraisal, which constitutes a crime, he shall be investigated for criminal responsibility according to law; If it does not constitute a crime, it shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

Legal basis: Article 76 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC): The parties may apply to the people's court for an appraisal on the specialized issue of finding out the facts. If the parties apply for appraisal, the qualified appraisers shall be determined by both parties through consultation; If negotiation fails, it shall be designated by the people's court. If the parties concerned do not apply for identification, and the people's court considers it necessary to identify specialized issues, it shall entrust a qualified appraiser for identification.

Article 77 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC): An appraiser has the right to know the case materials needed for the appraisal, and may ask the parties and witnesses when necessary. The appraiser shall put forward written appraisal opinions and sign or seal the appraisal book.