The criminal complaint should state: (1) The complainant’s name, gender, age, ethnicity, place of origin, occupation, work unit, address, current residence of the detained complainant, etc. (2) Reason. Refers to who is dissatisfied with the judgment of which court and what brand for which case. (3) Request matters. State the issues that the complainant requests the People's Court to resolve. (4) Application facts and reasons. This is an important part of the complaint. First, describe the facts determined by the original judgment, list the evidence, and then defend, refute, and correct the errors made by the original judgment in determining facts, characterization, application of law, execution of litigation procedures, or unfair handling of civil administrative cases. (5) Name of the submitting agency, signature and seal of the complainant, and date. (6) Attachments. The number of copies of the complaint and the number of physical evidence and documentary evidence. The format of the complaint includes the title, the basic information of the complaint, the basic information of the other party’s complainant, the reasons and requests for the complaint, the receiving authority, the signature and seal of the complainant, date, attachments and other parts.

Article 252 of the "Criminal Procedure Law" The parties, their legal representatives, and close relatives may lodge a complaint with the People's Court or the People's Procuratorate against a legally effective judgment or ruling. However, The execution of judgments and rulings cannot be stopped. Article 253: If the complaints of the parties, their legal representatives, and close relatives meet any of the following circumstances, the People's Court shall conduct a new trial: (1) There is new evidence proving that the facts determined in the original judgment or ruling were indeed erroneous; It may affect the conviction and sentencing; (2) The evidence on which the conviction and sentencing is based is unreliable, insufficient and should be excluded in accordance with the law, or there is a contradiction between the main evidence proving the facts of the case; (3) The applicable law of the original judgment or ruling is indeed correct. Wrong; (4) Violation of the legal procedures, which may affect a fair trial; (5) The judges engaged in corruption, bribery, malpractice for personal gain, and perverting the law when hearing the case.