One applicant "has not found such an owner" and the other applicant abstained. Why was the application approved?
Residents of the residential area told reporters that according to the contents announced by the Real Estate Bureau in official website, Mr. Ding, one of the main applicants for Su Jianhaoting's street lamp maintenance project with maintenance funds, showed that he lived on the16th floor of a residential area when filling in the information, but the published voting form did not contain the relevant contents of the house number. In addition, residents found from the "Eye of the Sky" that Mr. Ding has shareholding relations with residential construction companies and residential property companies. Mr. Zhou, another applicant of the project, actually abstained from voting on the voting form. Residents believe that this shows how arbitrary the project is when applying for maintenance funds.
So, are the survey results of residents in the community true? I hope relevant departments can come forward to explain the situation clearly.
Question 2:
Does the refund mean that "the property forged the owner's signature" has been recognized by the competent department?
During the interview, some residents suggested that since the owner received the refund, did it mean that the property was indeed at fault, and did the relevant departments confirm that the owner's signature was forged?
Earlier, the reporter learned that the owner had carried out some self-inspection and found that more than 40 signatures of/kloc-0 were forged. On that summary table, many homeowners are empty or have signed "Disagreement". "More than 140 households have clearly stated that their signatures have been forged, and this number has exceeded one-third of all owners." One owner said that according to the relevant regulations, more than two-thirds of all owners need to agree to use the maintenance funds. Obviously, the current situation is less than two-thirds.
Some owners told reporters that they had received the notice of June165438+1October 10, which was signed by Su Jian Haoting's property problem handling working group. The notice requires the owner to bring valid identity documents to the working group to reflect the existence of non-signature. During this period, a total of 228 owners signed to confirm that their signatures were forged.
After receiving the signature confirmation from the residents, the working group should give them a reply. However, so far, the working group has not given specific findings.
Question 3:
Is there any omission in the incident by the real estate bureau, and will the property involved be punished?
The reporter learned in the previous interview that the relevant departments of jianye district Real Estate Bureau made it clear from the beginning that they were not responsible for the authenticity of the documents. With the increasing number of signature owners, the relevant departments changed their minds and said that they would review the authenticity of the owners' signatures. So, should the relevant departments review the authenticity of the signature?
More importantly, does the refund mean that the property can "muddle through"? Residential owners believe that the relevant departments have always lacked a clear attitude about whether this property will be punished and what kind of punishment will be accepted.
According to the property management regulations, if special maintenance funds are misappropriated, the local real estate administrative department shall recover the misappropriated special maintenance funds, give a warning, confiscate the illegal income, and may impose a fine of less than 2 times the amount of misappropriation; If the case constitutes a crime, the directly responsible person in charge and other directly responsible personnel shall be investigated for criminal responsibility according to law.
2
22 gold coins have been received.
Gold coins can be exchanged for cash.
Withdraw cash immediately
The police are beautiful! 159000 has been saved!
Anshun net police patrol law enforcement