Current location - Quotes Website - Signature design - There is a gap between Lei Jiayin and Li Xian. Who steals the camera more from the two people in Antique close encounter of mahjong?
There is a gap between Lei Jiayin and Li Xian. Who steals the camera more from the two people in Antique close encounter of mahjong?

I think Lei Jiayin steals the show. He has a lot of scenes, and he has a sense of joy.

Recently, the film "Antique close encounter of mahjong" started in Beijing and released its first concept poster. Among them, Lei Jiayin, Li Xian and Xin Zhilei, the leading stars, are working together for the first time, and they are very much looking forward to their performance on the same stage. Of course, Ge You is one of them, and the cast is very strong. Guo Zijian, the director, has been nominated for the best director in the Hong Kong Academy Awards for many times, and is undoubtedly a powerful director.

Although director Guo Zijian's works in recent years are not ideal, lianglin, the producer of Antique close encounter of mahjong, together with three screenwriters, Zhu Xuan, Huang Hai and Fan Wenwen, has ensured the quality of this film, and fans are also very much looking forward to it. It is expected that the film will be released in 22.

Whether it is the theatrical version or the upcoming film version of Antique close encounter of mahjong, the main plot is still an incident caused by an antique Buddha head. Miss Kimoto from Japan is about to return a Buddha head of Wu Zetian Mingtang in the Tang Dynasty to China, and the reason for the return may be guilt or "atonement".

In the film, when Miss Kimoto returned the Buddha's head, we should pay attention to their older generation. Miss Kimoto's grandfather bought the Buddha's national treasure from the grandfather who made a wish, but now Miss Kimoto holds a return ceremony, but it is far from smooth as expected, and Miss Kimoto only returns it to the man to make a wish. This dragged the man who originally had the talent to learn from the past but was "not ambitious" into this "big pit".

In the theatrical version, the image of the "male owner" has deviated from the original. In the first 1 minutes, the male owner has already sold "fakes". As an elite in the antique industry, I don't know how he got along. The most important thing in this industry is credibility. The movie version should not make the same mistake, and the adaptation of the script should be wonderful.

And the only thing that makes me "distressed" in this film is the medicine played by Li Xian. As the medicine in the original, not so many people care about it, but as Li Xian, who has just made a big circle of fans, the medicine played by him is different. Although he is not a male, his popularity is even worse.