In labor arbitration, some companies will maliciously imitate employee signatures or splice foreign signatures through software, which is quite bad! In fact, if we forge evidence by imitating or splicing signatures, we can investigate the legal responsibilities of the corresponding responsible person of the company, ranging from fines to detention! But many employees don't know how to operate, or don't want to do it for fear of trouble. The fraudulent behavior of the company in the labor contract can be divided into the following categories: first, the company did not sign the contract at all, and deliberately forged the personal signatures of the company employees; Second, no labor contract was signed at all, and the employee's signature in the field was spliced into the labor contract; 3. Both parties have signed a labor contract, but the signed contract is blank and there are some loopholes, and the company will add content privately. If the two parties sign a blank contract, the company adds the content privately, which is basically helpless, because as long as you sign it, even a blank contract is equivalent to giving the company unlimited authorization in the blank. In most cases, employees are helpless. Unless the content added by the company itself violates relevant laws. If enterprises imitate signatures and piece together personal signatures, the concept will be different! First, if it is a stitching signature, it is usually sent to the employee's current labor contract by using the employee's signature on other documents through the computer program P, so the enterprise certainly has no original, and the above signatures are basically printed by computer, not handwritten. At this time, if the company doesn't have the receipt of the labor contract signed by you, then the employee can say, "The company didn't provide the original, but the contract is a copy, which belongs to the company and is spliced by computer software and will not be recognized." In this case, it is difficult to conclude that the company has signed a labor contract with you. Because this copy is not enough to represent the original. Second, if the enterprise asks you to sign on blank printing paper and then prints the specific contents of the labor contract elsewhere, this high probability can be regarded as signing the contract, because you can't prove the order. However, few companies can play like this. So don't worry too much about this.