Legal analysis: the name of the contract is wrong, and it is impossible to prove that the parties to the contract are themselves, so the contract is invalid; However, the two sides reached an agreement on correcting the mistake and revised the wrong signature, and the contract is still valid.

According to Article 7 of the Civil Law, civil subjects should follow the principle of honesty and credit, adhere to honesty and credit, and keep their promises when engaging in civil activities.

Article 143 stipulates that a civil juristic act that meets the following conditions is valid:

(1) The actor has corresponding capacity for civil conduct;

(2) the meaning is true;

(three) does not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations, and does not violate public order and good customs.

Article 543 stipulates that the parties may modify the contract through consultation.

Legal basis: Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC).

Article 7 Civil subjects engaged in civil activities shall follow the principle of honesty and credit and abide by credit.

Article 143 A civil juristic act that meets the following conditions is valid:

(1) The actor has corresponding capacity for civil conduct;

(2) the meaning is true;

(three) does not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations, and does not violate public order and good customs.

Article 543 The parties may modify the contract through consultation.