Example of interim checklist

Note: For reference only. You should fill it out in detail according to the title and content of your paper. Don't treat everyone the same!

Student Name

Zhang San

Grade

Grade 20××

Major

< p> International Trade

Date of filling in the form

2010.10.20

Design (thesis) title

××××××× × × × × × × × × × × × ×

Task

Task

does not necessarily have a serial number like 123. Just summarize what you have already done! Please fill in as much detail as possible!

1. After interviewing with the instructor, the topic of the thesis was determined;

2. Collecting relevant literature and data required for writing this article;

3. After many discussions with the teacher, the writing outline of this article was determined;

4. Completed the writing of the literature review;

5. So far, most of the first draft has been completed Writing (approximately complete the writing tasks of 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, and 4/5 of the first draft; basically complete the writing tasks of the first draft). 6. Preliminary completion of the catalog; 7. Writing of the completed foreword;

Whether it meets the requirements of the task statement

Compliant (or: basically consistent, generally consistent)

Still

required

to be completed

Task

Continue to complete the writing of the first draft;

Supplementary collection of required data and references;

Revise and polish the paper;

Organize the format to meet the school's standard requirements;

Consider the opinions;

Organize the references; write Chinese abstracts and English abstracts; etc.

Can the task be completed on time

Can

be saved

in

Questions

Problems

and

Solutions

Solutions

Methods

Existing problems

The main structure of the article is not very clear;

The viewpoint is not clear enough;

The logic of the argument is not rigorous enough; The content lacks the latest data, the argument is not in-depth enough, and there are no detailed actual data and cases to prove the argument;

Some places in the article that use other literature materials are not marked with comments;

In addition, the language of the article is jerky, with some typos and bad sentences. The format is not standardized enough.

Measures to be taken

Listen to the instructor’s opinions and adjust the structure of the paper;

Enhance the logic and rigor of the article, and use the theories and latest statistics learned Carry out detailed and in-depth argumentation of data;

Extensively and carefully read relevant professional literature and standardize academic terminology;

Supplementary data collection and strive to cite the latest authoritative data;

< p>Look up relevant examples within the professional scope of this topic, and use the examples to make more detailed and in-depth arguments;

Standardize the relevant notes;

Read the article carefully and make corrections Eliminate typos and punctuation marks, polish the text, and add transitional and echoing sentences to enhance the logic of the article.

Opinions of the instructor

Signature:

Opinions of the mid-term inspection expert group

Signature of the team leader:

Teaching Dean’s opinion

Signature: