Current location - Quotes Website - Signature design - Li Yapeng lost the final trial of his "40 million yuan debt case". How to interpret this judgment from a legal perspective?
Li Yapeng lost the final trial of his "40 million yuan debt case". How to interpret this judgment from a legal perspective?

From a legal perspective, Li Yapeng should indeed repay this debt. This economic dispute case has lasted for so many years and gone through 6 court proceedings. This is indeed a difficult time for the victim company. After a difficult journey, although Li Yapeng respected the court's decision, he still refused to admit that he had borrowed money. Some people complained on Li Yapeng's behalf. At that time, Li Yapeng was completely deceived by his partners and signed a contract with the other company. Moreover, Li Yapeng also signed a personal guarantee. The other company holds Li Yapeng's signature of personal guarantee, which naturally has legal basis. From a legal perspective, Li Yapeng does need to bear the main responsibility for this dispute.

Li Yapeng? 40 million debt case? The final defeat caused a lot of heated discussion. After the final verdict came out, Li Yapeng’s brother immediately filed an appeal, but was rejected by the court. In response to the online Li Yapeng also responded to the rumors. He expressed respect for the outcome of the trial, but insisted that he did not borrow money and that he would not hate the other party in the future, let alone hold the other party accountable. This matter was a huge blow to Li Yapeng. , not only did he have to bear huge debts, but he also had a bad reputation.

Friends who have paid attention to this case know that this economic dispute lasted for many years. Li Yapeng even begged the other party. It seemed that he really could not come up with the money, and he also believed that he did not have it. After borrowing this money, it is understood that Li Yapeng wanted to start a real estate business in Lijiang at that time, and signed a contract with this company after being introduced by an acquaintance. However, the partners accepted the other company's financing request without Li Yapeng's knowledge.

Some people may say that since Li Yapeng has not borrowed money, then this partner should bear the debt. In fact, this is indeed the case. However, the other party deceived Li Yapeng into signing a personal guarantee, so this result occurred. , the court pays attention to evidence and materials. Although Li Yapeng suffered a loss, he could not produce any evidence to prove his innocence.