Handwriting identification has legal effect and is evidence with strong credibility. It doesn't matter if the other party doesn't admit it, as long as the judge approves it. If the handwriting identification fails to make a clear conclusion, the court shall consider that the corresponding claims of the parties applying for judicial identification are invalid and bear the adverse consequences of not being able to provide evidence. In civil litigation, handwriting identification is generally that one party applies to the Handwriting Judicial Bureau for identification because he thinks that the handwriting on the written evidence provided by the other party is forged or altered (such as imitating or impersonating the signature of others) to determine whether the handwriting on the material is written by the party himself. According to the rules of proof, under normal circumstances, the party who claims that documentary evidence is forged or altered should bear the burden of proof and apply to the court for judicial identification of handwriting. If the final appraisal conclusion is that the handwriting on the material is not written by the party himself, then the claim that the evidence is not his own handwriting cannot be established, and the court shall bear the adverse responsibility of failing to provide evidence, and the court shall preside over the corresponding litigation request of the other party. In addition, if there is no clear conclusion in the first judicial appraisal, the parties have the right to request a new appraisal; At the same time, according to the actual situation, the parties can also consider applying for judicial expertise to judge whether the evidence is forged or altered from the time when the handwriting is formed, so as to protect their legitimate rights and interests. # # According to the provisions of Article 63 of the Civil Procedure Law, there are documentary evidence, material evidence, audio-visual materials, witness testimony, statements of the parties, expert conclusions, records of inquests, etc. Handwriting appraisal result is an appraisal conclusion, and fingerprint appraisal is also an appraisal conclusion. The expert conclusion belongs to evidence, and a single evidence does not necessarily determine the success or failure of the case. But objectively speaking, expert conclusions are very important for judges to determine the facts. If there is no other evidence to overturn the expert conclusion, the judge will tend to determine the facts according to the expert conclusion. Handwriting identification has legal effect # # Article 63 of China's Civil Procedure Law stipulates: "Evidence includes documentary evidence, physical evidence, audio-visual materials, witness testimony, statements of the parties, expert conclusions, records of inquests, etc. The result of handwriting identification is a kind of identification conclusion, which belongs to evidence. A single evidence does not necessarily determine the success or failure of a case. But objectively speaking, expert conclusions are very important for judges to determine the facts. If there is no other evidence to overturn the expert conclusion, the judge will tend to determine the facts according to the expert conclusion. Article 7 1 of the Supreme People's Court's Provisions on Evidence in Civil Proceedings stipulates: "If the parties have no evidence and reasons contrary to the appraisal conclusion made by the appraisal department entrusted by the people's court, they may determine the probative force. "The conclusion of handwriting appraisal has legal effect.