Current location - Quotes Website - Signature design - The "acquisition" of distinguishing the authenticity of sports shoes was cloned. What rights and interests of the acquirer have been infringed by this behavior of counterfeiters?
The "acquisition" of distinguishing the authenticity of sports shoes was cloned. What rights and interests of the acquirer have been infringed by this behavior of counterfeiters?
Cloning other people's things at will is officially cloning, and it is also said that the public is copying other people's things and infringing on others' right to sell goods. It will also have an impact on the brand's reputation, which in turn will lead to an impact on economic benefits.

For product infringement, there are mainly these methods and situations. The types of liability principles for sellers to undertake product infringement compensation mainly include: fault liability principle, fault presumption liability principle, strict liability principle, no-fault liability principle and absolute liability principle. 1. The principle of fault liability refers to investigating the producers and sellers of damaged products for damages, provided that they are subjectively at fault, and there is no responsibility without fault. 2. The principle of presumption of fault liability, that is, the way of "inversion of burden of proof" is adopted, and the producer or seller provides a reasonable defense to prove that there is no fault in the process of product manufacturing and sales. If the defendant cannot prove that he is not at fault, he is presumed to be at fault.

3. The principle of strict liability means that as long as the product is defective, causing unreasonable damage to consumers or users, and thus causing personal or property damage, regardless of whether the injurer is subjectively at fault or not, he shall be liable for damages. Compared with fault liability principle and fault presumption liability principle, strict liability principle is advanced.

4. The principle of no-fault liability means that after the damage caused by product defects occurs, regardless of whether the actor is subjectively at fault or not, as long as the law stipulates that he should bear civil liability, the actor will bear the liability for damages.

Selling fakes after cloning other people's brands, so as to achieve the purpose of earning profits, fundamentally affects the income, and selling expensive products after cloning may also have a great impact on the reputation and status of brands in people's minds. However, these are difficult to solve. Nowadays, many people want to take shortcuts and earn profits through some abnormal means and channels, but they should also be reminded that they can't escape after all.