Received a letter from the Commission for Discipline Inspection asking what leading cadres should do:
1. First, confirm whether the inquiry is legal, such as whether to affix an official seal.
2. If an inquiry is indeed made according to law, a written reply shall be given according to the requirements of the inquiry.
The details are as follows: after receiving the notice of inquiry sent by the discipline inspection and supervision organs, leading cadres should give a written reply to the inquiry question realistically within 15 working days, including the explanation of the problem and specific rectification measures. If it is really impossible to reply within the specified time due to special circumstances, the leading cadres shall report to the internal organs of the discipline inspection and supervision organs responsible for letters and visits for approval, and appropriately extend the reply time. At the same time, the "Regulations on Inner-Party Supervision" stipulates that leading cadres should make clear and thorough the issue of organizing letters and visits at democratic life meetings and accept organizational supervision.
3. It should be noted that the discipline inspection and supervision organs will seriously deal with the behavior of not handling letters and visits from organizations according to regulations, and relevant leading cadres will bear the consequences. Moreover, if the reply question is ambiguous, the explanation of the question is unclear, and the comprehensive rectification measures are not specific, the discipline inspection and supervision organ will send a letter to ask again.
Discipline inspection and supervision organs will give criticism, education, organizational treatment or disciplinary action to the accountable leading cadres according to the seriousness of the case. If the problem is not truthfully explained to the organization and the circumstances are serious, a warning or a serious warning will be given. Disciplinary actions such as not knowing, not converging, and retaliating after questioning will be dealt with seriously in accordance with relevant party discipline regulations.
Extended data:
Chapter IV Conversations and Inquiries
Eighteenth to talk about the way to deal with clues, it should be drawn up to talk about the program and related work plan, and according to the procedures for approval. If the principal responsible person of the Party committee (Party group) at the next lower level needs to talk and consult, it shall be reported to the principal responsible person of the discipline inspection organ for approval, and report to the principal responsible person of the Party committee at the same level when necessary.
Nineteenth conversations should be conducted by the relevant person in charge of the discipline inspection organ or the principal responsible person of the undertaking department, and can be accompanied by the principal responsible person of the party Committee (party group) or the discipline inspection commission (discipline inspection group) where the interviewee is located; Upon approval, it can also be entrusted to the principal responsible person of the party Committee (party group) where the interviewee is located.
Work records should be formed during the conversation, and written explanations should be written by the interviewee as appropriate after the conversation.
Twentieth letters and visits should be served in the name of the general office (room) of the discipline inspection organ, and copied to the main person in charge of the party Committee (party group) to which it belongs. The respondent shall write the explanatory materials within 15 working days after receiving the letter, and the main person in charge of the party Committee (party group) shall sign the opinions and send a letter to reply.
If the respondent is the principal responsible person of the Party Committee (Party Group), or if the explanation made by the respondent involves the principal responsible person of the Party Committee (Party Group), it shall directly reply to the discipline inspection organ that sent the letter.
Twenty-first conversations and inquiries should be completed within 30 days after the end of the conversation or the receipt of the inquiry reply, and the undertaking department should write a report and submit it for approval. Make corresponding treatment according to different situations:
(a) reflect the untrue, or there is no evidence to prove that there are problems that need to be solved and clarified;
(two) the problem is minor, and it is not necessary to investigate the responsibility of the party discipline, and it is handled by means of conversation reminding, criticism and education, ordering inspection, and admonishing conversation;
(3) If the problem reflected is more specific, but the respondent denies it, or thinks there are obvious problems, it shall talk again or make preliminary verification.
Conversation and inquiry materials should be stored in personal integrity files.
Chapter V Preliminary Verification
Twenty-second to deal with the problem clues by means of preliminary verification, a work plan should be formulated, a verification team should be set up, and the examination and approval procedures should be fulfilled. If the person being verified is the principal responsible person of the Party committee (party group) at the next lower level, it shall be reported by the discipline inspection organ to the principal responsible person of the Party committee at the same level for approval.
Article 23 Upon approval, the inspection team may take necessary measures to collect evidence, talk with relevant personnel to understand the situation, ask relevant organizations to make explanations, obtain personal reports on relevant matters, consult copied documents, accounts, files and other materials, verify assets and relevant materials, and conduct evaluation and inspection.
If it is necessary to take measures such as technical investigation or exit restriction, the discipline inspection organ shall strictly perform the examination and approval procedures and report to the relevant authorities for implementation.
Twenty-fourth after the initial verification, the verification team shall write a preliminary verification report, listing the basic situation of the verified person, the main problems reflected, the basis for handling, the preliminary verification results, the existing doubts and suggestions for handling, which shall be signed by all the personnel of the verification team for future reference.
The undertaking department shall comprehensively analyze the initial nuclear situation, and put forward disposal suggestions in accordance with the proposed filing review, closing, conversation reminder, temporary investigation outside prison or handing over to the relevant party organizations for handling.
The initial nuclear report shall be submitted to the principal responsible person of the discipline inspection organ for examination and approval, and if necessary, it shall be reported to the principal responsible person of the party Committee (party group) at the same level.
Baidu Encyclopedia: China * * * Party's Discipline Inspection Organs Supervision and Discipline Work Rules (Trial)