I don't think the key point of this conflict is that Jiang Tao cursed health care. It's just a quarrel and conflict, which can't cause such a big contradiction and conflict, and it can't ferment into such an influential public opinion event.
Jiang Tao felt very wronged, and felt that he had been brought into the rhythm by the medical big V, and felt that the public opinion in the medical circle reacted too strongly to this. He really didn't understand why the medical staff reacted so violently. So naturally feel wronged, and even feel hacked.
The focus of the conflict lies in Jiang Tao's video shooting and verbal violence against medical staff. The signal received by the medical staff is to surf the Internet, and it is the Internet celebrity V. Jiang Heyi has fundamental differences and completely different understandings of this behavior, which is the key point of contradiction.
Jiang Tao thinks, I'm not making trouble with doctors, just making videos, recording normally and defending rights.
But will the medical staff think so? I'm sorry! No. Because this is essentially a medical problem! Threats during filming have interfered with the order of medical work. This is not a medical problem. What is it? Once the fragmented and edited video is posted online, the hospital is involved in public opinion events, which is difficult to refute. This is not a medical trouble. What is it?
Doctors have seen too many such tricks. First of all, words constantly stimulate you to humiliate you, insult you, stimulate you until your emotions are out of control, clearly record your gaffes, but delete all the causes for you. If this black doctor's online behavior is not medical trouble, then there is no medical trouble in this world at all.
Mr. Jiang can put himself in others' shoes. During the doctor's consultation, the doctor pointed his mobile phone at you without the consent of your patient. His language and manner are so disrespectful and distrustful that he even swears. Can patients accept such behavior from doctors?
Well, here's the question! Since patients can't accept being photographed and stabbed online, it is very unreasonable to find fault and ask doctors to accept such so-called "supervision".
A good medical concept should be that medical treatment is a private act. The privacy of patients needs to be protected, and so does the privacy of doctors. Don't disclose your real name and poke it online easily. If you must make a video, do it politely with the permission of the doctor (patient).
Without this premise and tacit understanding, it is extremely reckless and impolite for anyone to point a mobile video at others. Especially when medical staff express their refusal and disgust to shoot videos, it is even more unacceptable to be chased by people and affect their work. In essence, this is not a medical trouble.
This medical common sense is difficult to understand. But in essence, this kind of video stabs the threat of network language. Medical staff have a zero tolerance attitude, which is a professional instinct habit.
Another reason for the conflict is that unlike the medical staff's understanding of the patient's condition, Jiang lost trust and respect for the medical staff's handling, but wanted to control the medical staff to handle the condition according to their own understanding.
In this tertiary hospital, Jiang's wish can't be realized, because the medical staff must stick to their professional opinions.
Jiang Tao's apology was only due to the pressure of media public opinion, but he didn't really realize his behavior was wrong.
So I will feel very wronged and think that I have no medical trouble.
Subjectively, you don't want to make trouble, objectively, you are making trouble. This is a basic factual judgment.