For example, after receiving the notice of the meeting, you can sign it like this: "Please ask XX leaders to review it, and suggest that the deputy general managers in charge of the business of the first branch and the third branch 1 attend the meeting." Sign and date below.
Question 2: How to write the Baidu search reference after investigation and processing in the closing approval form, or don't be ashamed to ask and look at the approval form of the predecessors.
Question 3: Before sending a letter to other bureaus in the name of the bureau, it needs to be audited by the leader in charge and sent to the director for signature. How to write the comments on the application form? 1. Issue a document (whether it is a letter, request for instructions or report): send it to the lower level for review, and then send it to the higher level for issuance. Do you think if the superior sends it to the subordinate for review first, can the subordinate have any objection? . .
2. I don't know whether the documents issued by the landlord unit are issued at the same time or successively:
Send them out in sequence (i.e. send them to the leader in charge for review, return them to the landlord, and then send them to the director for signature), and then send them to the reading and processing sign. Write it first: If you plan to write this, please ask the deputy director of * * * for approval. It will be sent to the leader in charge for examination and approval, and then returned to the landlord. Then write on the delivery sign: It is planned to be written in this way, and it has been sent to the deputy director of * * * for approval, and please ask the director for approval. Then send it to the director for signature.
At the same time, it will be sent out and handled by a specific agent. Then write: It is planned to be sent to the deputy director of * * * for review, and then sent to the director for signature.
3. Dealing with the signed opinions is mainly for the specific managers to see and know how to deal with them, and the landlord does not have to pay too much attention to the words. If you are too worried, just look through the previous documents and see how it is written. . .
Question 4: How to deal with the results of the standard review is a matter for the Bureau of Standards of the National Development and Reform Commission, and it is also a matter for the National Development and Reform Commission. What do you want to know about this situation?
Question 5: During the disciplinary review, the unit under investigation needs to provide information. If there is no problem, the organization will not investigate a cadre casually. They will take the investigation away on the premise of basically mastering the evidence. After all, it is still very cautious and serious when it comes to the appointment of cadres.
During the investigation by the procuratorate, the disciplinary committee may deal with party member.
For a long time, China has adopted a mature routine for the criminal cases of corruption of leading cadres in party member, that is, the disciplinary committee at the same level first conducts investigation and evidence collection, then conducts qualitative analysis within the party, and then "suggests that the judicial organs handle the cases according to law" and submits the cases to the procuratorate for examination and prosecution.
1. After the disciplinary inspection department investigates party member for violating discipline, only those who are seriously violating discipline and suspected of committing a crime will transfer the case to judicial organs for handling.
Second, if it is just a general violation of discipline, the Commission for Discipline Inspection will deal with it directly. Or directly handle it yourself, or suggest relevant departments to handle it.
Three, was identified as a serious violation of discipline, before the transfer, the Commission for Discipline Inspection should generally meet with the results of the investigation, listen to their complaints, or immediately make a decision. Or wait until the judiciary closes the whole case.
In particular, serious violations of discipline, as a criminal case, the discipline inspection department will generally make a preliminary party discipline treatment before the transfer. In general, public opinion is not very concerned. Generally, we will wait until the whole case is reviewed before making the final treatment.
：
* * * Provisions of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection on the working procedures of disciplinary cases in party member.
Chapter I General Provisions
Article 1 These Provisions are formulated in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Regulations on the Trial of Cases by the Party's Disciplinary Inspection Organs, and in combination with the experience and actual situation in the trial of disciplinary cases in party member.
Article 2 In order to ensure the quality of handling cases, safeguard the interests of party member citizens and correctly enforce Party discipline, discipline inspection organs at all levels must handle cases in accordance with these Provisions.
Article 3 After the case has been examined, it must be handed over to the case trial department or specialized trial personnel for trial.
Article 4 The trial of cases shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions on the authority for examination and approval of disciplinary cases.
Article 5 If a judge is a party to the case or a close relative of the party, or has an interest in the case, he shall withdraw. Party member who made mistakes also has the right to ask them to quit the Party. The withdrawal of judges must be approved, and the trial of a case may not be stopped without approval.
The withdrawal of the person in charge of the case hearing department shall be decided by the Standing Committee of the Commission for Discipline Inspection at the corresponding level in charge of the case hearing; The withdrawal of judges in other cases shall be decided by the person in charge of the judicial department.
Chapter II Acceptance of Cases of Violation of Discipline
Article 6 The case hearing department accepts the following cases:
(1) Cases reported by Party committees and discipline inspection committees at lower levels need the approval of Party committees and discipline inspection committees at the same level;
(2) Cases directly inspected by the Supervision Department of the Commission for Discipline Inspection at the corresponding level and directly decided by the Party Committee and the Commission for Discipline Inspection at the corresponding level;
(three) cases that need to be reported to the higher party committees and discipline inspection commissions for approval;
(4) Filing cases reported by lower-level Party committees and discipline inspection commissions;
(five) cases assigned by the responsible comrades of the Commission for Discipline Inspection at the corresponding level or the party organizations at higher levels;
(six) the appeal review cases reported by the lower party committees and discipline inspection commissions and approved by the discipline inspection commissions at the same level;
(seven) the complainant is still dissatisfied with the conclusions and decisions of the review approved by the lower party committees and discipline inspection commissions, and the lower party committees and discipline inspection commissions report the review cases that require review;
(eight) cases referred by administrative supervision organs, public security organs, people's procuratorates and people's courts that require disciplinary action. Among them, those who need further investigation and evidence collection shall be transferred to the trial after supplementary investigation by the Supervision Department of the Commission for Discipline Inspection that accepted the case or the organ that submitted the case for transfer. If additional evidence needs to be investigated individually, the judicial department of the Commission for Discipline Inspection accepting the case shall investigate and supplement the evidence.
Article 7 Party committees and discipline inspection commissions at lower levels shall submit the following materials to higher levels for examining and approving cases:
(a) Request for approval;
(two) the punishment decision and the wrong factual materials on which it is based;
(3) Investigation report and main evidential materials;
(four) the review opinions of the relevant disciplinary committees and party organizations at all levels;
(five) the inspection of party member who made mistakes and the opinions on the punishment decision;
(6) Party organizations' wrong opinions on party member.
The case transferred by the Supervision Department of the Commission for Discipline Inspection at the corresponding level shall have the following materials:
(1) Basis for filing a case;
(two) the wrong factual materials, the opinions of the inspected person on the wrong factual materials and the explanation of the inspection team on their opinions;
(3) Investigation report and main evidential materials;
(4) ......> & gt
Question 6: Do you need a period at the end of the request for instructions of administrative official documents or at the end? Asking for instructions is generally used to ask for instructions, and it usually ends with "No, please give instructions." Or "If the above instructions are correct, please ask the leader for instructions." .
Sometimes it is used to request approval, and it can end with "If not, please reply".
Punctuation is used at the end.
Question 7: The internal audit of the company found some minor problems, but they have been solved. How to write a report to describe the problem clearly, demonstrate the harm of the problem, analyze the causes of the problem, and propose solutions and preventive methods?
Question 8: 1 non-conformance report was issued by the external audit of standardization of the government. How to write a rectification report when it is checked that a management method and other documents are not controlled according to the requirements of document management procedures?
I. Summary of nonconformities:
Second, the reason analysis
Three, the rectification plan (including measures and completion time, responsible person)
Fourth,
Correct the situation, draw inferences from others.
Question 9: The court of second instance has handled several cases of appeal. According to the provisions of Article 170 of the Civil Procedure Law, after hearing the appeal, the people's court of second instance shall deal with it according to the following circumstances:
(a) the original judgment or ruling found that the facts were clear and the applicable law was correct, and the judgment or ruling rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment or ruling;
(two) the original judgment or ruling found that the facts were wrong or the applicable law was wrong, and the judgment was revised, revoked or changed according to law;
(3) If the basic facts of the original judgment are unclear, the original judgment shall be revoked and sent back to the people's court that originally tried for retrial, or the judgment shall be revised after the facts are ascertained;
(4) If the parties concerned are omitted from the original judgment, or the judgment by default is illegal and seriously violates legal procedures, the original judgment shall be revoked and sent back to the people's court that originally tried the case for retrial.
Question 10: To write a report and submit it to the office meeting to review the workflow, how to write it should be a trial report: based on the post, write clearly the personal work attitude and focus; I also have my own working methods (suggestion: give some personal suggestions that are helpful to my work in view of the existing system)