1, this problem is more troublesome, not just the signature problem, but the key is that there is no transfer registration, so the property right certificate has not been changed, and the litigation court recognizes the property right certificate.

Don't worry about this lawsuit. Now you have the initiative. You live in a house anyway.

3. If the other party has sued, it can respond to the lawsuit. Now, follow the procedure first. Litigation strategy:

One is to see how the other party provides evidence. The principle of evidence in China's civil law is that whoever advocates gives evidence. Now that the other party has signed it, let's say that the son signed it on his behalf to show evidence. If he doesn't dare to make a written appraisal, then you ask the court to make a written appraisal.

The second is to look at the attitude of the judge. If the judge thinks it's good for you, you should answer the lawsuit; If the judge thinks that the contract is pending and the transfer is invalid, you should file a counterclaim immediately (this is a very important time, and if you file it too early, you will also agree that the transfer is invalid. If the case is filed too late, the court will make a judgment, and you will lose the case. Counterclaim requires the other party to compensate for economic losses, which is equivalent to the value-added part of the house. For example, the house was bought at 6,543,800 yuan, and now it has appreciated to 300,000 yuan. You ask the other party to pay 200,000 yuan, and then they return 6,543,800 yuan, so you won't suffer. So, you must remember this last trick! !

Third, in litigation, we must insist that the other party is dishonest, and there are faults from signing the contract to performing the contract.

As for criminal responsibility, judging from your reaction, there is no crime of fraud and perjury. This is neither subjective intention nor objective fact. Customers just regret buying a house now and make excuses for wanting to come back. The witness said he couldn't remember clearly, but he was afraid of offending the other side. It's okay. He signed it. That is, there is no signature and perjury, and there is no perjury in civil proceedings. Therefore, it is of little significance not to talk about this issue. On the contrary, my views are not supported by the court, and I am more passive.