The validity of a concealed civil juristic act with false intention shall be handled in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.
Article 147 The validity of a civil juristic act based on a major misunderstanding. For a civil juristic act based on gross misunderstanding, the actor has the right to request the people's court or an arbitration institution to cancel it.
Article 148 If a party commits a civil juristic act against its true meaning by fraudulent means, the defrauded party has the right to request a people's court or an arbitration institution to cancel it.
Article 149 If a third party commits a civil legal act against its true meaning, and the other party knows or should know about the act, the aggrieved party has the right to request the people's court or an arbitration institution to cancel it.
Article 150 If one party or a third party coerces the other party to carry out a civil juristic act against its true meaning, the coerced party has the right to request the people's court or an arbitration institution to cancel it.
Article 151 Validity of Civil Legal Acts If a party in obviously unfair takes advantage of the other party's danger and lack of judgment, resulting in the establishment of a obviously unfair, the injured party has the right to request the people's court or an arbitration institution to cancel it.