Legal analysis: need to bear the risk of surgery. As far as the legal norms of medical management are concerned, as long as they are immediate family members, they have the right to decide whether to treat patients. In other words, whether or not to agree to sign is the right of family members. Without the signature of family members, in case of emergency, the hospital should also treat patients and save lives; With the signature of family members, if patients do not follow the medical standard process, they should also bear the responsibility for problems.

Legal basis: the basic standard of medical record writing

Tenth medical activities that require the written consent of patients shall be signed by the patients themselves. When the patient does not have full capacity for civil conduct, it shall be signed by his legal representative; When the patient is unable to sign due to illness, it shall be signed by the person authorized by him; In order to rescue patients, if the legal representative or the authorized person cannot sign in time, the person in charge of the medical institution or the authorized person may sign. If it is not appropriate to explain the situation to the patient due to the implementation of protective medical measures, it shall inform the patient's close relatives, and the informed consent form shall be signed by the patient's close relatives and recorded in time. If the patient has no close relatives or the patient's close relatives are unable to sign the consent form, the consent form shall be signed by the patient's legal representative or relevant person.

Twenty-third surgical consent refers to the medical document that the attending physician informed the patient of the planned operation before the operation, and the patient signed whether or not to agree to the operation. The contents include preoperative diagnosis, operation name, possible complications during or after operation, operation risk, patient signature, signature of attending doctor and operator, etc.