1. In court, the judge will first look at the identity documents of both parties, then read out a series of court rules and ask the parties whether they want the court personnel to withdraw. Generally, it is not necessary to withdraw.

2, the judge asked the plaintiff to state their claims and reasons, and produce evidence (sometimes the judge in order to save time, usually use a sentence, said the defendant has seen the prosecution, this step can be omitted). Unless the plaintiff has a new statement, it can be added.

The defendant refuted the facts and reasons put forward by the plaintiff and produced the evidence.

4, the judge asked the plaintiff and the defendant about the evidence of the case, what are their views and opinions or rebuttals-this is called cross-examination, and will also ask the specific details involved. If the evidence needs to be further appraised "whether it is true or not", an application for "judicial appraisal" should be made at this time.

Under the auspices of the judge, the plaintiff and the defendant debated.

6. After the debate, the judge will ask both parties whether they are willing to settle the dispute through mediation. If both parties are willing to mediate and can mediate successfully, the judge will issue a mediation letter, which will take effect after both parties sign it; If you are unwilling to mediate, or if mediation fails, the judge will not mediate.

If both parties can mediate again a few days after the court session and reach an agreement, they can tell the judge that the mediation is successful and the court will issue a "legally effective" mediation book.

7. During the whole trial, a clerk recorded the speeches of both sides. If one party is unwilling to mediate, the clerk will print out the trial record after each statement, asking both parties to see if there is any discrepancy with the speech at the trial, and some of them can be amended appropriately and signed on the spot. After both parties read or modify the transcripts of the trial, the trial ends.

Extended data:

The significance of trial

Hearing in court is the most basic and important stage in the ordinary procedure, and it is the most concentrated and vivid embodiment of the parties exercising their right to appeal and the people's court exercising their judicial power, which is of great significance to the people's court correctly hearing civil cases. First of all, the hearing can ensure the correct exercise of the people's court's judicial power.

Through trial, judges objectively identify the facts of civil cases, comprehensively examine evidence, distinguish right from wrong, and handle civil cases fairly in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law, thus realizing the trial function of the people's courts.

Secondly, it is conducive to the effective supervision of judicial activities. Opening a court session puts the trial process of a case under the supervision of the masses, which increases the transparency of trial activities and is conducive to ensuring the fairness of handling cases.

Third, it is conducive to protecting the litigation rights and substantive rights of the parties. The civil procedure law fully stipulates the litigation rights of the parties in the trial and the way to exercise the litigation rights. The trial is conducive to the parties fully exercising their litigation rights, consciously fulfilling their litigation obligations, ensuring the smooth progress of trial activities, and ultimately protecting the civil substantive rights of the parties.

Fourth, it is conducive to giving full play to the educational role of trial and expanding the effect of legal publicity.

References:

Baidu Encyclopedia-Trial