Current location - Quotes Website - Signature design - Is it helpful to supplement the written materials after the trial?
Is it helpful to supplement the written materials after the trial?
After the hearing, some judges will say that they can make a written statement to the court if they have opinions, and some judges will not say so.

Under normal circumstances, in the practice of our lawyers, unless we are lazy, we will generally submit written materials to the judge again according to the trial situation.

There are several reasons for this.

First of all, before the trial, although the focus of the case will be summarized by itself, it is the real focus of the case that the presiding judge pays attention to and summarizes. Then the trial and the whole trial, and later the judges and lawyers of both sides paid attention to these focus cases. Some focus cases were not prepared before the trial. After the trial, it is still necessary to find laws and regulations, comprehensively find cases, write detailed agency opinions, and submit them to the judge for reference.

Secondly, a good lawyer will think about the judge's ideas and write proxy words according to the judge's ideas. The highest realm is that the proxy words written by lawyers later appear directly in the court's judgment, so as a lawyer, the written materials submitted after the court have played a huge role.

In fact, whether you reiterate your point of view, or explain the case according to the trial situation and provide similar cases, you need to submit such things in writing after the trial.