Current location - Quotes Website - Signature design - What's the difference between on-site transcripts and inquest transcripts?
What's the difference between on-site transcripts and inquest transcripts?
Legal analysis: The difference between on-site transcripts and inspection transcripts is as follows: the producers are different. The record of the inquest shall be made by the staff of the administrative organ or the judges of the court; On-site transcripts can only be made by administrative organs. Reflect different facts. The record of inquest is a record that reflects the objective situation after investigating, inspecting, measuring, photographing and drawing the places, objects and scenes related to the case in the administrative procedure and litigation process, and is generally carried out after the case occurs; On-the-spot record is the administrative organ's record of the on-site situation of law enforcement. Generally, it is a dynamic fact, reflecting the situation at the time of taking notes. The time stages of production are different. Records of inspection made in the course of administrative litigation; On-site transcripts are made when specific administrative actions are taken. It contains different contents. On-site transcripts may include transcripts of administrative organs interrogating parties who violate administrative regulations, while inquests do not include transcripts of interrogating parties.

Legal basis: Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC).

Article 111 Reports, complaints and reports may be made in writing or orally. The staff who accept the oral report, complaint or report shall make a written record, which shall be signed or sealed by the informant, complainant and informant after being correctly read out. The staff who accept the complaint and report shall explain the legal responsibility of false accusation and frame-up to the complainant and informant. However, as long as it is not fabricating facts and evidence, even if the facts of the accusation and report are different, or even false accusation, it should be strictly distinguished from false accusation. Public security organs, people's procuratorates or people's courts shall ensure the safety of informants, complainants, informants and their close relatives. Informants, complainants and informants who are unwilling to disclose their names and report, accuse and report their acts shall keep them confidential.

Article 133 An inquest or inspection shall be written in a written record, which shall be signed or sealed by the participants and witnesses.

Article 135 In order to find out the case, when necessary, with the approval of the person in charge of the public security organ, investigation experiments may be conducted. The investigation of the experiment shall be recorded in the record and signed or sealed by the participants in the experiment. In the investigation and experiment, all dangerous, insulting or immoral behaviors are prohibited.