Life is not easy, but do it and cherish it! This sentence is just right to describe the American group takeaway riders who are running all over the street now.

There is a reaction from the takeaway rider: If you want to continue to be a takeaway rider, you must sign two agreements: one is the hosting service agreement for individual industrial and commercial households, and the other is the service agreement between the platform and the individual. If you don't do what the delegation asks, you can't go on doing it.

Many people may not understand the intention of the US Mission. In fact, from the perspective of enterprise management and economic interests, the purpose of doing so is nothing more than:

The first advantage: Meituan has completely turned the employment relationship with riders into a cooperative relationship, avoiding the main employment responsibilities and labor insurance risks.

According to the formal employment contract, 7 million riders are employees of Meituan, and Meituan has to pay tens or even billions of social security and commercial insurance fees a year. Therefore, the human-intensive Internet companies such as Meituan, Hungry, Didi, etc. all outsource their human resources to thousands of human resources companies to clarify the relationship with their subordinates.

Now upgrading this human resource outsourcing relationship to a cooperative relationship with individual industrial and commercial households of riders can be said to have nothing to do with riders. Meituan cooperates with everyone. Meituan is not responsible for the labor relations, medical insurance, social security and accident insurance of take-away riders. Who came up with this trick? Too high! A "Gold Award for Best Enterprise Consulting and Planning of the Year" should be awarded!

The second advantage of doing this directly increases the profitability of the US Mission. Imagine: the social security and labor insurance costs saved in one year are tens or even billions. Such a huge expenditure is directly the company's net profit, which is beyond doubt. The financial statements are also good-looking, and the wallet of Meituan is also bulging.

Internet giants like Didi and Meituan do not engage in technological innovation, but engage in institutional innovation every day. Rack one's brains to take advantage of capital, engage in community group buying to grab the rice bowls of vegetable farmers and merchants, and now try to squeeze the hard money of riders. At the same time, using the monopoly advantage of the industry, it has controlled tens of millions of labor resources across the country.

Making a big plate, listing and financing, losing money every year, and the hard work of riders is not guaranteed, which is irresponsible in itself. In foreign countries, such enterprises are estimated to have been split long ago.

Behind every rider and driver is a real family, with a wife, children and old people. The rider has to bear the financial burden of the whole family. Now there is no basic guarantee. If something really happens, it will be greatly affected.

Personally, I think the state should introduce policies to regulate the behavior of companies like Meituan. Otherwise, if these giants are allowed to develop like this, is it really a good thing to finally form the trust of capitalists?