Member Assessment System Charter The assessment system is an important part of the student union’s rules and regulations and is a prerequisite for the smooth development of the student union’s work. This charter is mainly based on the "XX College Student Union Charter", with appropriate reference to other links and evaluation factors in the work of the student union, and strives to evaluate the work of members in a fair, just and open system environment, and provide rewards and punishments for members and cadres. Provide the necessary basis for selection. 1. Evaluation Scope This regulation applies to the departmental officers, ministers, deputy ministers and assistant ministers of the student union of the college. They are evaluated by the Youth League Committee of the college and are linked to the department evaluation results in accordance with the "XX College Student Union Departmental Assessment System Charter". This charter does not make specific provisions. . 2. Evaluation principles 1. The evaluation of the ministers, deputy ministers and assistant ministers of each department of the Student Union is mainly the responsibility of the vice-chairman in charge. The evaluation of members of each department is mainly the responsibility of the minister of each department or the department cadre designated by the vice-chairman in charge. 2. The evaluation work of each department is supervised by the Student Affairs Office and the Presidium of the Self-Government Committee, and all members should actively cooperate. 3. The person in charge of the evaluation should follow the principles of fairness, impartiality, and openness during the evaluation process, promptly explain to the parties the reasons for a certain evaluation score, and be responsible for the evaluation results of each member. 4. Officers of each department should submit work summaries in a timely manner to obtain evaluation results after completing their work tasks. If the application is overdue, the evaluation director of this department has the right not to award the evaluation result for this job. 3. Assessment Process 1. The "Student Union Work Manual" is kept by individuals and should be carried with them when attending regular meetings or participating in other self-management committee work to ensure the timeliness and authenticity of work records. 2. The ministers of each department are mainly responsible for verifying the evaluation results of members, and recording them in the "Student Union Work Manual" in a timely manner. They must be based on facts, evaluate one thing at a time, and perform evaluations from time to time. 3. In the assessment of regular meetings and daily work, the minister or activity leader will first review and sign the results of its members. During each regular meeting, the heads of each department will verify and sign the assessment results in the "Student Union Work Manual" of each member, and then submit it to the presidium for review and then file it in the office. 4. In addition to the assessment results and signatures of the evaluators on the "Student Union Work Manual", each work assessment must also be accompanied by the "Student Union" seal, otherwise it will be deemed invalid and will not be included in the total score during the final evaluation. 5. The presidium shall supervise the evaluation work of the respective responsible departments, and fraud is strictly prohibited. The Presidium will conduct spot checks on the evaluation work of each department in due course. 4. Assessment Methods This charter is mainly based on the "XX College Student Union Charter" and is divided into two parts: "Regular Meeting Assessment" and "Daily Work Assessment". The assessment results are divided into four levels: excellent, good, passing, and failing. Specific details The content is as follows: (1) Regular meeting evaluation 1. Those who do not attend the regular meeting without reason or are seriously late or leave early will be regarded as "failed" ("failed" results will be recorded at the next regular meeting) 2. Those who participate in the regular meeting on time and seriously will be regarded as "passed". . 3. Those who attend regular meetings on time and can actively express their opinions or take the initiative to take on tasks are considered "good". 4. Those who attend regular meetings on time and have creative opinions or have them adopted are considered "excellent". 2) Daily work evaluation 1. The assigned worker who does not work seriously, resulting in poor work completion results or fails to complete the work in time (if there is an objective reason for failing to complete the work task in time, the work evaluation personnel may handle it as appropriate. .) 2. Those who have made outstanding contributions to the work on time will be rated as "Excellent". 5. Those who are excellent shall not exceed 20% of the total number of people participating in this work, and those who are good shall not exceed 50% of those who participate in this activity. 6. Scope of daily work evaluation: The scope of daily work evaluated in this regulation is limited to creative and organizational work. Including simple pure physical work, but the accumulation of multiple (more than 2 times) physical work can be given a work evaluation record. The evaluation results will be assessed by the minister based on the number of work, work attitude and work completion quality. In principle, "good" (not good) will be given. Including good grades or above. 5. Processing of evaluation results 1. Each department director shall make a fair and impartial written evaluation of the performance of the officers in the semester, and submit the evaluation results to the office at the end of the semester. Points are calculated ("Excellent" is worth 5 points, "Good" is worth 3 points, "Pass" is worth 1 point, and "Fail" is worth -1 point.), and the points obtained by adding up the points are the final score. 3. At the end of the semester, the five students with the lowest overall score in each department will be given a warning and a written statement will be submitted to the office for archiving after being reviewed by the head of the department. The three students with the lowest overall score this semester will be dismissed. 4. According to the regulations of the college, they will be dismissed. Those who have been a college-level student cadre for one year and are qualified or above in the annual assessment can add moral education points. The specific bonus points will be implemented according to the relevant rules (the maximum points will be added once for holding multiple positions in the same academic year.) 5. The above bonus points will be used as a bonus. Reference content for titles such as “Outstanding Student Cadres of the College”, “Excellent League Members”, and “Three Good Students”. 6. The overall evaluation results at the end of each semester will be the main basis for self-management committee member rewards and cadre selection.

These regulations will come into effect upon issuance. Note: For reference only