Question 1: Professional title review. How to write the recommendation for a work in an expert recommendation letter? What professional title are you reviewing now? Has the paper been published?

Question 2: How to write professional title review and unit recommendation? During his time in our company, this comrade worked hard to learn professional knowledge, studied hard, solved technical problems, and achieved great results, saving ** funds for the company and creating ** benefits. In other aspects, the comrade can actively communicate with leaders and colleagues, has a harmonious relationship with the unit, can take the initiative to help others, is upright, and dares to take responsibility. Ideologically, this comrade actively participates in the company's party and government work, has high political awareness, and has participated in many social welfare activities. After research by the unit leadership, it was agreed to recommend this comrade to participate in the **professional title review. **unit, **time! Hope for reference.

Question 3: What are the advantages and disadvantages of the expert opinion in the recommendation form of the expert academic committee? Do you agree or not?

Question 4: How to write the expert appraisal of the professional title representative work 2

Instructions for filling in the form

1. This form is for university teachers and researchers in natural science research, experimental technology, and social science (education management

to apply for qualifications for senior positions) Representative works submitted for review will be used for appraisal by peer experts. 2. Requirements for filling in the form: Pages 1-3 and "Masterpiece Title" on pages 4 and 7 should be filled in by the applicant, and the school personnel department should review and stamp the form; the number should be filled in by the Provincial Department of Education's Vocational Reform Office. 3. This form can be copied, but it must be printed on both sides, and the layout and page numbers cannot be changed.

Requirements for the appraisal of masterpieces

1. The appraisal of masterpieces is a serious task and an important step in ensuring the quality of the review. Appraisal experts must be highly responsible and realistic, and make appropriate and fair evaluations based on the actual level of the representative work and the declared professional and technical positions. Avoid untrue evaluations that are too strict or too lenient.

2. "Evaluation of representative works" is an evaluation of each representative work (part) provided by the applicant. Experts are asked to fill in the submitted papers and works one by one. The "Comprehensive Appraisal Opinion of Representative Works" is a comprehensive evaluation opinion on the applicant's academic achievements, personal research capabilities, or certain shortcomings in the applicant's representative works. The "expert appraisal conclusion opinion" must clearly state whether the requirements for promotion to the corresponding position are met. Opinions are divided into three categories: ① The academic level has reached the job requirements; ② The academic level has basically met the job requirements; ③ The academic level has not yet met the job requirements. Experts are asked to put "√" on the corresponding options. After completing the relevant columns, the expert must sign on the "Expert Appraisal Conclusion (B)".

3. The representative works of those who apply for qualifications for senior and deputy senior positions shall be appraised by peer experts with senior positions, and the representative works of those who apply for qualifications for deputy senior positions shall be appraised by peer experts with senior positions.

4. Ask the experts to submit the "Peer Expert Appraisal Form" together with the representative work (original) to the human resources department of the school. Do not hand it directly to the applicant or the applicant's school.

5. Please ask the human resources department of the school where the expert works to sign their opinions in the corresponding column on page 7 and stamp their official seal, and then return the materials to the Job Reform Office of the Fujian Provincial Department of Education.

Sincerely thank the experts and their schools for their strong support in the evaluation of professional and technical positions for teaching and research personnel in colleges and universities in Fujian Province!

wenku.baidu/...eDycbu

Question 5: In the recommendation form of the expert committee for professional and technical personnel title review, what content is included in the expert committee’s recommendation? urgent! 5 points Agree to recommend!

Question 6: How to write recommendations for forestry professional and technical personnel application? Professional Title (Professional Title) originally originated from the job title. In theory, professional title refers to the professional and technical level, ability, and achievement level of professional and technical personnel. The title reflects the technical level and work ability of professional and technical personnel.

As far as academics are concerned, it has the nature of an academic title; as far as professional and technical levels are concerned, it has the nature of a position. Professional skills.

Question 7: How to write expert appraisal opinions for senior engineering review papers. Commonly cumbersome titles such as: 'Research on rapid analysis methods of chemical components contained in molten steel'. In this type of topic, if words like 'about' and 'research' are omitted, it will not affect the expression. Since it is a paper, it always contains research and what aspects of research it is about. Therefore, the above topic can be refined into: 'Rapid analysis method of chemical composition of molten steel'. With this change, the number of words has been reduced from 21 to 12, making it clean, concise and concise to read.

Question 8: How to fill in the opinion of the grassroots unit for promotion to intermediate engineer? The content of the grassroots unit opinion is not filled in by yourself, but the evaluation given by the unit based on your performance, and the opinion of agreeing to the promotion of the comrade.

Question 9: Serving as professional title review expert *** There are ____ bidders participating in the bidding for this project, namely: ―――――――――――――――――― ――――――――――

In the preliminary review, the compliance and completeness of the bid documents of _____ bidders met the requirements of the bidding documents and entered detailed review. The situation is as follows: ____________________________

After comprehensive review, the scores and rankings of each bidder are as follows: ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―

Based on the above review results and the relevant provisions of the bidding documents, it is recommended:

The first winning bidder:

The second winning bidder:

Question 10: How to write a review opinion for a thesis for promotion to professorship? Definition: First point out the essence of the other party’s error, and then refute the pointed out erroneous arguments, and while criticizing or Then he put forward his correct point of view and demonstrated it tit for tat.

Three elements of an argumentative essay: argument, argument, argument

Write a point of view based on the topic and then explain it. The most important thing is to have the ability to persuade, and one of the three elements is indispensable. Read the detailed introduction below carefully, and you can try writing more in the future, so that your composition can improve. In addition, you should also memorize some famous aphorisms and celebrity examples for better application in your composition. In general, the argument of an argumentative essay is to solve the problem of "what to prove", the argument is to solve the problem of "what to prove", and the argument is to solve the problem of "how to prove".

[3] Argument

An argument is a sentence that correctly and clearly explains the author's point of view. It is the soul and commander of an article. Any article has only one central argument and can generally have sub-arguments.

The argument should be correct, clear, and summarized. It should be a complete judgment sentence and must not be ambiguous.

①Correctness: The persuasiveness of an argument is rooted in the correct reflection of objective things, which in turn depends on whether the author’s position, viewpoint, attitude, and method are correct. If the argument itself is incorrect, it may even be absurd. Yes, no amount of argumentation can convince people. Therefore, correct arguments are the minimum requirement for an argumentative essay.

②Clarity: What you agree with and what you oppose must be very clear and must not be ambiguous or vague.

③Novelty: The argument should be as novel and profound as possible, beyond the opinions of others. It should not repeat other people’s clichés, nor be irrelevant and general talk. It should be as unique and novel as possible.

There are generally four positions for arguments: title, beginning, middle of the article, and end. But more often than not, it is at the beginning of the article, and the same is true for paragraph arguments. When there are similar sentences at the beginning and end, the one at the beginning is the argument, and the one at the end is the echo argument.

The arguments of some argumentative essays are expressed in clear sentences in the article, and we only need to find them; some are not expressed directly in clear sentences, and the readers need to extract and extract them themselves. Generalization. The summarized sentences should not contain rhetorical devices.

Note: rhetorical questions and metaphors cannot be used as arguments, they must be declarative sentences