Current location - Quotes Website - Signature design - Who should provide the proof of administrative compulsory measures?
Who should provide the proof of administrative compulsory measures?
Legal subjectivity:

Many behaviors of people in daily life will also be punished by law enforcement departments. Of course, in the process of punishment, if you are not satisfied, you can bring an administrative reconsideration at any time. In fact, administrative punishment is also about obtaining evidence.

First, who is the certificate of administrative compulsory measures?

(a) the basic situation of the parties and the brand and type of vehicles;

(two) the illegal facts and the basis for taking administrative compulsory measures;

(three) the way and time limit for applying for administrative reconsideration or bringing an administrative lawsuit;

(4) Signature of the parties concerned;

(five) the signature or seal of the traffic police, and the seal of the traffic management department of the public security organ;

(6) Date of issue.

Administrative coercive measures refer to the acts that administrative organs temporarily restrict citizens' personal freedom or temporarily control the property of citizens, legal persons or other organizations in the process of administrative management in order to stop illegal acts, prevent evidence from being damaged, avoid harm and control the expansion of danger. Administrative enforcement refers to the act of an administrative organ or an administrative organ applying to a people's court to enforce the obligations of a citizen, legal person or other organization that fails to perform an administrative decision.

Types of administrative coercive measures: (1) restricting citizens' personal freedom; (2) sealing up places, facilities or property; (3) seizing property; (4) Freezing deposits and remittances; (5) Other administrative compulsory measures.

On the basis of administrative measures, administrative compulsory measures define the scope and attributes of administrative measures with the word "compulsory". Compared with administrative measures, the scope of administrative coercive measures is narrowed, and its attribute is defined by "coercion", but its connotation and actual reference should still be a method or means with the same attribute, but only a method or means with coercive nature.

Two. Time limit for applying to the court for compulsory execution of administrative punishment

Time limit for compulsory execution of administrative punishment:

(1) If the applicant is a citizen, the time limit for applying for the enforcement of an effective administrative judgment, administrative ruling, administrative compensation judgment or administrative compensation conciliation statement is 1 year, and if the applicant is an administrative organ, legal person or other organization, it is 180 days;

(2) The time limit for applying for execution shall be counted from the last day of the performance period determined by legal documents; If the legal document does not stipulate the time limit for performance, it shall be counted from the date when the legal document is served on the party concerned;

(3) If the application is overdue, the people's court will not accept it unless there are justified reasons.

(IV) Administrative Punishment Law Article 51 If a party fails to perform the decision on administrative punishment within the time limit, the administrative organ that made the decision on administrative punishment may take the following measures:

(1) If the fine is not paid at the due date, a late fee of 3% of the fine amount will be added every day;

(2) Auction the sealed-up or detained property according to law or allocate frozen deposits to offset the fine;

(3) Apply to the people's court for compulsory execution.

3. What are the responsibilities of guardians in administrative punishment?

China's administrative punishment law does not stipulate that the guardian shall bear administrative responsibility for the illegal acts of the ward. It only stipulates that the guardian has the obligation to educate the ward and strengthen management after the administrative organ decides not to punish him for illegal acts. The reason for this provision is the following considerations: the implementation of administrative punishment must implement the principle that whoever violates the law is responsible. Therefore, although the illegal behavior of the ward may be related to the guardian's neglect of education and management of the ward, the guardian should not be allowed to suffer on his behalf, because the failure to perform guardianship duties and illegal behavior are two legal issues, and administrative punishment cannot be simply stipulated, otherwise it will not conform to the principle of "a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime".

The guardianship system in China is based on the civil law. First of all, the guardianship system is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of people without or with limited capacity for civil conduct, and to make up for the lack of capacity of the ward by the guardian participating in civil activities on behalf of the ward. The second is to restrain the behavior of the ward, prevent the ward from committing illegal acts, and maintain social stability.

Legal objectivity:

Administrative Compulsory Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 10

Administrative compulsory measures are set by law.

If no law has been enacted and it falls within the scope of the State Council's administrative functions and powers, administrative regulations may set other administrative compulsory measures besides the first and fourth items of Article 9 of this Law and the administrative compulsory measures that should be prescribed by law.

Where laws and administrative regulations have not been formulated and belong to local affairs, local regulations may set administrative compulsory measures in items 2 and 3 of Article 9 of this Law.

Other normative documents other than laws and regulations shall not set administrative compulsory measures.