Administrative reply 1 Respondent:
Address:
Legal representative:
Respondents:
The respondent requests to cancel the administrative penalty imposed by the respondent on _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
1. The factual evidence of the administrative punishment imposed by the respondent on the counterpart of administrative punishment _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ On the day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The respondent served the Notice of Pre-administrative Punishment on _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ on _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. And on _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Second, the plaintiff's claim is not based on facts.
(1) The administrative penalty decision made by us to the counterpart of administrative penalty shall be delivered to the business front face to face by the administrative law enforcement personnel. At that time, his existence of _ _ _ _ _ was not the phenomenon that he claimed to find the administrative penalty decision on the ground.
(2) The counterpart of administrative punishment is that the sanitation department failed to _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. According to this regulation, the respondent ordered the administrative penalty counterpart to rectify the behavior of not paying the _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fee within a time limit. The Respondent also served the Advance Notice of Administrative Punishment, but the counterpart of administrative punishment still failed to pay the fee of _ _ _ _ _ _ _, so the Respondent made a decision on administrative punishment to the counterpart of administrative punishment according to law. Third; The respondent ordered the counterpart of administrative punishment to pay _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ yuan.
Based on the above facts and reasons, the plaintiff's claim lacks facts and evidence, and the evidence is insufficient. I implore your judge to understand clearly and reject the original application.
I am here to convey
_ _ _ _ _ People's Court
Defendant: _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Attached:
_ _ _ _ copies of defense;
_ _ _ _ _ copies of evidence materials
Administrative reply 2 Name of the respondent:
Address:
Contact telephone number:
Name of legal representative:
Location:
Name of entrusted agent:
Work unit:
Contact telephone number:
In the case of _ _ _ _ _, the reply is as follows: (basis and reason)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________。
To sum up, the respondent thinks: (defense opinion)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________。
I am here to convey
_ _ _ _ _ People's Court
Signature of Legal Representative: _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Signature and seal of the respondent: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Attachment: copy of the defense;
_ _ _ _ _ copies of evidence materials
3. The administrative reply of the respondent _ _ _ _ Municipal Bureau of Construction and Environmental Protection. Address _ _ _ _ City _ _ Road _ _. Legal Representative: Wang, director of the Municipal Bureau of Construction and Environmental Protection.
Regarding the case of the respondent v. the respondent's architectural planning dispute, the defense is as follows:
1. According to Article 11 of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, this case is not within the scope of the people's court.
Chapter II of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates the scope of administrative cases accepted by the people's courts. Only when administrative disputes are involved in the scope of accepting cases, the people's courts have the power of judicial review, and can file a case for acceptance and make a judgment. The administrative counterpart has the right to bring a lawsuit to the people's court. The disputed matters involved in the case of the defendant suing the defendant do not fall within the scope of accepting cases by the people's court as stipulated by law. The respondent's planning, design and planning changes are not directed at specific citizens, legal persons and other organizations, but only based on their functions and powers, relevant provisions of laws and regulations, and combined with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. In China, the Town Planning Law does not provide for administrative proceedings on such matters. Accordingly, the respondent's change of planning is not a specific administrative act, and there is no legal basis for the respondent to sue the respondent.
Two, even if the respondent's administrative act can bring an administrative lawsuit according to law, according to the provisions of Article 39 of China's administrative procedure law, the respondent's prosecution to your hospital has exceeded the limitation of action.
China's "Administrative Procedure Law" stipulates that if a citizen, legal person or other organization brings a lawsuit directly to the people's court, it shall do so within three months from the date of knowing that it has taken a specific administrative act. If the time limit exceeds the prescribed time limit, it shall be deemed that the citizen, legal person or organization has waived the litigation right. Even if the lawsuit is filed again, the people's court should not accept it. On June 5438+065438+1October, 20___ _, the respondent approved the application of _ _ _ co., ltd. to change the design, and the house was completed and accepted in 20___ _, and the respondent has filed a lawsuit with _ _ _ _ co., ltd. on the house sales contract and compensation dispute. City Intermediate People's Court. In the civil judgment (20__ _ _ _ _ _ Minchuzi No.94) made by the Municipal Intermediate People's Court on February 6, 20, it has been mentioned that "the defendant will carry out the construction project according to the planning and design approved by the planning department", and it will be in 20__ at the latest.
To sum up, the respondent believes that your court should reject the respondent's claim and refuse to hear it.
I am here to convey
_ _ _ _ Municipal People's Court
The respondent _ _ _ _ Municipal Bureau of Construction and Environmental Protection Land.
(official seal)
20___ year 65438+1October 65438+1October.
Administrative defense 4 Respondent: Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of ×××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××× Legal representative: ××××, position: director.
Respondent: ××× Colored Plate Trailer Factory, address:No. ××× Road, XX Town, XX City. Legal representative (or person in charge): ×××××, position: factory director.
Third person: XX, male, Han nationality, born on XX, XX, address: XX village, XX county, XX province. Temporary residence:No. XX Road, XX Town, XX City.
Because the respondent ××× Color Plate Trailer Factory refused to accept the application of ×××× Color Plate Trailer Factory for ××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
1. According to the Administrative Complaint filed by the respondent, the plaintiff's unit was registered in XX County, XX City, and the defendant's work-related injury identification of a third person not only exceeded the jurisdiction of work-related injury identification, but also found that the facts were unclear and the procedures were illegal. The respondent believes that the respondent's statement is completely unfounded. According to Article 3 of the Notice of the former Ministry of Labor and Social Security on Issues Related to Migrant Workers' Participation in Work Injury Insurance (issued by the Ministry of Labor and Social Security 20xx 18), "If an employer fails to participate in work injury insurance at the place of registration and the place of production and operation, after the migrant workers are injured by accidents or suffer from occupational diseases, they shall conduct work injury identification and labor ability appraisal at the place of production and operation, and the employer shall pay work injury insurance benefits according to the provisions of the place of production and operation." As long as you compare this rule, it goes without saying. There is no legal basis for asking the respondent to investigate the third-party injury accident that occurred within the jurisdiction of the respondent. If the respondent fails to apply for work-related injury insurance for a third party at the place of registration and the place of production and operation, the respondent shall accept the confirmation in accordance with the above provisions. The third person is injured during working hours and workplace due to work reasons, which meets the conditions for work-related injuries. Therefore, the defendant identified it as a work-related injury.
Second, the respondent claimed that "the third person was caused by drunkenness and should not be regarded as a work-related injury", lacking factual evidence. When the respondent sent someone to the construction site of the project management department to investigate and verify, the respondent's construction management staff said that the third person often drank before and after work, but did not say that he was drunk. Moreover, "drinking" and "getting drunk" are completely different in nature. If the third person is really "drunk" at work, why didn't the management of the respondent stop him? Before making the conclusion of work-related injury determination, the respondent informed the respondent in writing to give evidence, but the respondent never provided evidence of "drunkenness". Therefore, it is difficult for the respondent to deny the work-related injury on the grounds that the third person is "drunk".
Third, after investigation, the third person and his colleagues touched the top of the high-voltage line when installing the gantry, and were injured by electrical contact. From the analysis of the cause of the accident, the plaintiff can't escape the blame and bear certain responsibilities. Because we knew there was a high-voltage line on it before construction, but we didn't take the necessary protective measures, which led to such an accident.
To sum up, the work-related injury identification made by the respondent has clear facts, conclusive evidence, legal procedures and accurate applicable laws and regulations. Please ask the court to reject the plaintiff's lawsuit according to law and maintain the work-related injury identification made by the respondent.
I am here to convey
Xxxx people's court
Respondent: ××××× Human Resources and Social Security Bureau (seal)
date month year
Administrative defense 5 1, the meaning and application of administrative defense.
1) meaning
An administrative defense refers to a legal document in which the defendant or appellant rebuts the plaintiff's claim or the appellant's request according to the facts and reasons according to the contents of the administrative complaint or administrative appeal.
2), use
The application of administrative defense helps the respondent to safeguard his rights and interests, and also helps the people's court to fully understand the case and make a matter of justice.
2. The structure and content of administrative defense.
Administrative defense consists of head, body and tail.
1) title
The title includes the following items:
A. Title
The title should indicate the name of the document, that is, "administrative defense".
B, the basic situation of the parties
(See page 158 for details)
C. Causes of action
Point out the cases in which the defense was submitted, which leads to the following contents. The expression is generally "because of the situation ..., the defense is put forward as follows."
2) Text
This is the main part of the administrative defense, and the reasons for the defense should be explained here. The reasons for defense are usually shown in the following aspects: first, explain the truth and refute the other party's untrue words. The second is to state the relevant legal provisions and point out that the other party applies the law improperly. The third is to put forward defense claims and affirm attitudes.
3) Tail
I. conclusion
There are two main contents at the end: one is the name of the people's court. The second is signature, that is, the respondent's signature or seal, and indicate the date of submission. According to the regulations, the defendant shall submit the defense of the first instance to the people's court from the date of receiving the copy of the complaint; The defendant must submit the defense of the second instance to the people's court within ten days from the date of receiving the copy of the appeal. The defense must be submitted within the statutory time limit, so the time of presentation needs to be grasped.
B. Additional items
Attachment refers to the number of copies of the defense, the name and label of the attached evidence materials.
Administrative Pleadings 6 An administrative pleadings is a written reply made by the defendant to the people's court against the plaintiff and the appellee against the appellant in administrative litigation according to relevant facts and reasons.
Administrative defense has two main functions:
(1) reply according to law
It is a litigation right, not a litigation obligation, for the parties to raise a defense. In the course of litigation, after the defendant receives a copy of the complaint served by the court or the appellee receives a copy of the appeal, it mainly defends the contents of the complaint or appeal. Only when there is a reply can there be a reply, and a reply is an essential content.
(2) Refuting according to law
Through defense, the defendant and the appellee can make a targeted defense against the facts, reasons, basis and requests of the plaintiff or appellant, clarify their reasons and requirements, and present facts and evidence to prove their views. Refuting the other party with conclusive facts, sufficient evidence and relevant legal provisions, and proving that one's behavior is reasonable and legal, is the fundamental attribute of rebuttal.
Brief introduction of administrative reply 7:
The plaintiff Ma XX obtained the contracted land in the second round of contracting and transferred it to Qu Mou on May 9. From the beginning of Qu's farming, Qu began to enjoy grain subsidies. The plaintiff brought a lawsuit to the people's court, demanding that the transfer be deemed invalid and the land be recovered. The court ruled that the transfer method was unknown and rejected the application.
The plaintiff asked the people's government at the township level to directly subsidize himself with grain, and sued after being rejected.
Lawyer Li made a reply on behalf of the defendant:
Reply:
First, the plaintiff's prosecution does not belong to the scope of administrative cases accepted by the people's court:
The complaint requires that "the plaintiff should continue to perform the contract" belongs to the scope of acceptance of civil cases:
1. The plaintiff had obtained the right to contracted management of land in his own country, and the contracted land was transferred by the plaintiff Ma XX to Qu X, an outsider, on May 9, and he promised that "if the production team adjusts and changes, it will be contracted by Qu X". The land involved has been transferred to Qu X, who has enjoyed the right to contracted management of land since May 9, 20xx, and has been cultivated ever since;
2. On June 25th, 10, the plaintiff sued the people's court of XX county, demanding the return of the land. The XX County People's Court rejected the plaintiff's claim on the grounds that it could not prove what kind of circulation mode it was.
3. The original claim that the "suggested solution to the tourism procedure" was not established, and the people's court made a judgment dismissing the prosecution after hearing it, which means that the court has the right to accept it. The premise of "proposing administrative procedure to solve" is that the case does not fall within the scope of the people's court, and there is no such suggestion in the judgment of XX county court, and it is impossible to make such a suggestion;
4. The reason for rejecting the plaintiff's claim is that "the evidence cannot prove what kind of circulation mode it is". The plaintiff can collect evidence, file a civil lawsuit again and relieve his rights.
Two, the plaintiff "request the township government to change the plaintiff to receive agricultural subsidies" reason can not be established:
1, the outsider Qu X received "food subsidies" instead of "agricultural subsidies", and the use of "agricultural subsidies" in the complaint is obviously a concept of stealing;
2. According to the document requirements of the Ministry of Finance, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Agriculture, the State Grain Bureau and the Agricultural Development Bank of China in 20xx and 20xx, it is a direct subsidy to grain farmers, emphasizing "subsidies according to the planting area of grain farmers". Obviously, the object of food subsidies is the farmers who actually grow grain;
3. The plaintiff transferred the land to others on May 9, and lost the right to contract the management of the land, and did not actually plant the land;
4. Qu X, an outsider, has enjoyed the right to contracted management of land since May 9, and has been farming until now, actually bearing the agricultural tax until the agricultural tax is abolished;
5. Qu X, an outsider, is a farmer who actually manages grain production, and it is in line with the policy to obtain "grain subsidy";
To sum up, it is suggested that the people's court reject the plaintiff's claim in accordance with Article 69 of the Administrative Procedure Law.
Respondent: XXXXX Township People's Government.
Administrative defense 8 i. Concept and function
The administrative defense is a legal document that the administrative organ refutes and defends the facts and reasons accused by the administrative counterpart in the administrative complaint.
Second, the format, content and writing methods
Lawyers are entrusted by administrative organs to act as agents ad litem. When an administrative agency participates in responding to an administrative lawsuit, it shall guide and assist the administrative agency in its administrative defense.
According to the relevant provisions of China's administrative procedure law, it is an important litigation right for the administrative organ as the defendant to make a defense in administrative litigation. By exercising this right according to law, we can clearly explain the rationality, legality and opinions of its administrative actions, which is conducive to safeguarding its legitimate rights and interests and ensuring the administrative organs to exercise their administrative functions and powers according to law. At the same time, it can also play a positive role in helping people's courts fully understand the case and correctly handle the case.
The file format and content requirements of administrative defense are the same as those of civil defense. In the administrative defense, we should pay special attention to explain, refute and defend the plaintiff's claim and the facts and reasons on which it is based, and explain the factual basis, legal basis and legitimacy of China's specific administrative act in the defense.
standard
Administrative reply
(used by the accused administrative organ when submitting the defense)
Name of defendant:
Address:
Name of Representative: Title:
Telephone:
The respondent made the following defense for a case:
I am here to convey
Xxxx people's court
Respondent: ×××××
* * * * Year * * Month * * Day
Attached:
Source of this defense: Open Selection Leadership Examination.
Administrative defense 9 Respondent: ××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
Legal Representative: Li XX, deputy director.
The plaintiff, Zhang XX, accused our Bureau of conducting the investigation in (200×××× 200× 200×× 200×× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200× 200×.
Fire situation in Songshan forest area in suburb of XXX:
Songshan forest area in the northern suburb of XX city is a state-owned forest area. Xx city has issued many proclamations prohibiting tourists from having picnics and playing with fire in Songshan forest area. Especially in the dry and rainy season in winter and spring, tourists are strictly forbidden to organize various activities. This spring, the Forestry Diversification Bureau, together with the Public Security Bureau and the Education Bureau, issued a notice prohibiting students from going to Songshan for a spring outing to prevent fire. Xx City xx Middle School also conveyed the full text of the above notice in the whole school broadcast and faculty meeting. However, the students in XX class of this school still violate the regulations and use the holidays to organize students to go to Songshan for a spring outing privately. As a class teacher, Zhang XX not only did not discourage or stop it, but also provided financial support and help, and personally participated in it. In fact, he became the organizer of this spring outing to Songshan forest area. During the spring outing, he had a picnic, grilled fish and cooked with the students. Li X, a student, did not stop playing with fire, which eventually caused a fire. The fire area reached O.667 hectares and burned more than 65,438+0,000 young trees. In addition, the rural people in nearby factories were urgently mobilized to participate in the hard work of more than 300 firefighters for half a day, and 8 vehicles were used. * * * caused direct economic losses of more than 3,000 yuan to the state and the collective, and caused extremely bad influence to XX city.
Afterwards, our bureau, together with the Public Security Bureau and the Education Bureau, dealt with the responsible personnel of this incident respectively. In addition to the direct perpetrators, Li XX, a senior two student of XX Middle School, has been detained by the Public Security Bureau, and Zhang XX of XX Middle School has been given a penalty decision of fine 500 yuan, and was ordered to make an in-depth inspection through this incident, and suggested that the school give due disciplinary action.
Zhang XX, a middle school student in XX, not only refused to accept the punishment, but also filed an administrative lawsuit against our bureau in the people's court, demanding that the punishment decision be revoked, and lied that he was not the organizer of the spring outing and actively participated in the fire fighting activities. Improper punishment for him constitutes infringement. Now I will reply to Zhang XX's accusation and sophistry against our bureau in the lawsuit as follows.
1. Zhang XX said that he was only the invitee of this activity, not the organizer. As the head teacher of Class XX, Grade Two in middle school, Zhang XX is a teacher who has administrative responsibility for the students in this class, especially the school representative, and should be responsible for guiding the activities of the class meeting. Students organize classes to participate in activities prohibited by the government. As class teachers, they should have made it clear that they should stop it. Now Zhang XX not only does not stop it, but also pays for it and participates in it personally. This has actually become the organizer and supporter of this illegal activity. Therefore, Zhang XX has an unshirkable legal responsibility for the consequences of this fire.
2. Zhang XX said in the complaint that after the fire broke out, he "personally led the students to actively put out the fire". This is simply not in line with the facts. After the fire broke out, three students actively participated in the fighting, but the fire was getting bigger and bigger and it was difficult to contain it. Seeing that the situation was not good, Zhang XX urged the students to clean up the picnic site and let them escape from the sea of fire and the mountains. It's just that when people nearby come to put out the fire, they have to follow the firefighters up the mountain before putting out the fire, instead of "personally leading the students to actively put out the fire." The reason why Zhang XX made up this lie is nothing more than trying to pass the buck.
As a middle school teacher, Zhang XX knows that he has violated the government's ban and the law, so he should be punished by law. In his complaint, he even lowered himself to the level of an ordinary teenager who doesn't understand the law and reason, excusing his behavior, saying that he only agreed to organize this spring outing "to take care of the students' emotions" and "to maintain the unity of the class", which is obviously an unreasonable excuse and untenable.
In a word, Zhang XX's behavior has obviously violated the XX municipal government order and the relevant provisions of China's forest law, which constitutes a serious illegal act. There is nothing wrong with our punishment for him.
I am here to convey
XX District People's Court of XX City
Defendant: ×× Municipal Forestry Diversification Bureau.
Representative: Guo XX
200× year× month× day
Administrative reply 10 Respondent: _ _ _ _ _ Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce.
Legal Representative: Wang, Acting Director of the Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce.
Authorized Agent: Gu, deputy director of the Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce.
Authorized Agent: Ma.
The plaintiff Huang _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ County Agricultural Machinery Company and Shi _ _ _ _ _ refused to accept the first reconsideration decision. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
The plaintiff's complaint stated that their behavior and economic income in the transaction of 6 160 generator set were legal, and the decision of _ _ _ County Administration for Industry and Commerce to deal with them was wrong. According to the facts and laws, we believe that it is correct for _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
The so-called speculation refers to the act of illegally engaging in industrial and commercial activities, disrupting market management and undermining socialist economic procedures in violation of national financial, foreign exchange, gold and silver and industrial and commercial management regulations for the purpose of obtaining illegal profits. The subjective feature of this behavior is intentional, and the purpose is to seek illegal interests; Objectively speaking, it is manifested as violating the national financial, foreign exchange, gold and silver, and industrial and commercial management laws and regulations, illegally engaging in industrial and commercial activities, and disrupting the market. According to the above-mentioned legal concepts and characteristics of speculation, Article 1 of Notice on Investigating and Handling Speculation No.37 of the Provincial Administration for Industry and Commerce (_ _ _ _ _) stipulates that eight kinds of behaviors belong to speculation. Among them, the sixth behavior is "in production and circulation, shoddy, shoddy with less, fake with the real, adulterated with fake;" The eighth behavior is "providing certificates, invoices, contracts, bank accounts, checks, cash or other convenient conditions for people engaged in illegal reselling activities, and making profits from them". Huang, the plaintiff, was introduced by Shi, the plaintiff. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ It is such a defective product, the sales difference is 17400 yuan, and the interest is as high as 174%. _ _ _ County Agricultural Machinery Company made a profit of 2l90 yuan and charged an introduction fee of 3000 yuan. It can be seen that the plaintiffs Huang _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ and _ _ _ County Agricultural Machinery Company fully conform to the legal concept and characteristics of speculation in both subjective and objective aspects.
All in all, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Therefore, we use _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ to maintain it. Similarly, the plaintiff's lawsuit cannot be established and should be dismissed. In order to safeguard national interests and socialist economic procedures, the people's court is requested to make a judgment according to law.
I am here to convey
_ _ _ _ County People's Court