Patients who want to be cured should be treated, and patients who don’t want to be cured should give up treatment. We should respect every patient's right to live. Life is the highest right that belongs to everyone. Only the owner of life, that is, the patient himself, has the right to decide whether to end his life. For most people, they subjectively believe that life should end normally. In fact, whether it is a natural disaster or a man-made disaster, the patient's subjective consciousness has the desire to continue living, and the hospital will definitely do its best to save it. On the other hand, the patient's desire to end his subjective consciousness cannot be taken away by medicine or even law.

There is such an extreme phenomenon in medicine, called DNR, which refers to a patient who has stated that if his cardiopulmonary function stops, he will no longer perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation and accept natural death. Even for patients who have been confirmed in advance, their wishes will be respected and no intubation or cardiac resuscitation will be performed. Therefore, no external factors can override life. Only respecting the patient's wishes is the best treatment.

The law also has clear regulations on whether patients should receive treatment. First, the hospital respects and supports the right of patients or their authorized principals to make decisions on the basis of not violating national laws, regulations and social norms, and has the right to decide to refuse or terminate a certain treatment or request if they understand the consequences. Discharged. Second, when a patient or his authorized client refuses to receive treatment or requests to terminate treatment, the doctor in charge is still not prepared to explain to the patient or his authorized client and bear the possible consequences of refusing or terminating treatment.

Of course, the patient or his or her authorized representative shall bear the responsibility for his or her decision. Doctors have the right and obligation to be prepared, including other available treatment options. After the above explanation, if the patient or his authorized representative still refuses to receive treatment or requests to terminate treatment or be discharged, the patient or his authorized representative is asked to sign in the medical history record. Third, the patient's doctor in charge must re-examine the medical order to terminate a certain treatment to determine whether modification is needed, including changes in the patient's condition, at the request of the patient or his authorized client, and when the patient transfers to another department. To sum up, I believe that from a humanitarian perspective of respecting personal rights, there is no such thing as what kind of patients should be treated or what kind of patients should give up treatment, only whether the patient is willing to receive treatment.