Minutes of the Unit Project Completion Acceptance Meeting
In daily study, work or life, meeting minutes are used more and more widely in handling affairs. Meeting minutes are different from meeting minutes. Meeting minutes are only objective documentary materials. So how to write meeting minutes? Below are the minutes of the unit project completion acceptance meeting that I compiled for everyone for your reference. I hope it can help friends in need.
Minutes of the Unit Project Completion Acceptance Meeting 1
Time: xx, xx, year
Location: Construction site
Participants: See the sign-in sheet for details
This acceptance inspection will be organized by the construction unit to participate in the design, supervision, survey, construction and other units. The Municipal Quality Supervision Station will send personnel to participate, and an acceptance expert group will be established to be responsible for the completion of the project. Matters related to acceptance.
At the meeting, the owner first introduced the list of personnel of the acceptance team and reported on the implementation of relevant laws, regulations and mandatory standards for project construction during project construction.
The construction unit reports the project overview, the handling of problems encountered during the actual construction, and the summary and evaluation of engineering technical data. The construction unit's self-evaluation result of the project is "qualified".
The design and survey units also made corresponding reports: mainly focusing on the preliminary survey and design work of the project, and put forward their own opinions and suggestions in the preliminary work, which were recognized by the construction unit. During the construction of the project, all major acceptances (such as foundation, main branch acceptance, completion pre-acceptance, etc.) can be participated in on time. The project was assessed as "qualified".
The supervision unit reported on the control of raw materials entering the construction site, the inspection of each process and the acceptance of each branch. In daily work, through multiple regular construction site supervision meetings and regular special meetings, we resolve changes and rectifications encountered in the work. The project was assessed as "qualified".
After checking the project control data, the acceptance team inspected the project entity and believed that the overall quality of the project was good. At the same time, the acceptance team also put forward some suggestions and opinions, which are summarized as follows:
1. Elbows must be made at the lower openings of the downspouts on both sides of the roof blockhouses, and anti-scouring baffles must be made at the water outlets. The air-conditioning pipes on the roof are arranged in a messy manner and need to be sorted out. Some of the lightning protection settings on the roof are loose and should be dealt with.
2. There are too few clamps for individual fire risers; fire-proof partitions are made where the pipes in the air-conditioning duct wells pass through the floors.
3. After some finished doors are closed, the gap is too large and needs to be adjusted.
4. Some floor tiles with scratches or serious pollution on the surface must be replaced.
5. The details around the stairwell windows are not in place; some window accessories are incomplete and the glass glue is not neat.
6. The wall paint is rough in some places and needs to be repaired.
7. The stainless steel guardrails in some places are damaged and must be replaced.
8. There are traces of leakage in the gutter at the 11×E axis. The cause must be identified and dealt with.
Finally, the participating inspection and acceptance team members required the construction unit to complete the above rectifications within five days. After the supervisor reviewed the compliance, they unanimously agreed that the quality level of the project was qualified.
Construction unit, design unit
Survey unit, construction unit
Supervision unit
xx City Engineering Consulting Supervision Co., Ltd.
< p> Minutes of the unit project completion acceptance meeting on xx, xx, xx 2Time:
Location:
Moderator:
Participating units and personnel:
X Real Estate Co., Ltd.:
Supervision company:
Construction company:
Quality supervision station:
p>Design Institute:
Meeting Moderator:
Meeting Arrangement:
First introduce the acceptance team members, and then implement the project laws and regulations The situation will be introduced, and then the construction unit, design unit, construction unit, and supervision unit will conduct quality reports and quality assessments, and then conduct on-site quality inspections, and finally make a project acceptance summary.
1. The construction unit introduces the project and reports the acceptance opinions:
1. Before the acceptance of the project, we have carried out pre-acceptance together with the supervisor and the construction party. The stairs and steel found so far have The issues with doors and windows have been rectified and implemented.
2. Introduce the overview of the project:
This project is the XX project, with 6 floors, one garage floor, brick-concrete structure, total construction area m2, building length m, The width is m, the floor height is m, and the total building height of the house is m. The foundation adopts reinforcement method to ensure that the new and old foundations can be used together. The strength grade of the reinforced concrete for the foundation is C, and the strength grade of the concrete for the superstructure is C. The masonry uses MU standard fly ash bricks, the brick base uses M cement mortar, and the main body is built The mortar grade is M mixed mortar.
The exterior wall decoration is sand wall strong synthetic resin paint, and the floor is cement mortar surface; the garage floor doors and windows are steel doors and windows; the main doors and windows are PVC plastic steel doors and windows; the roof is cement mortar surface, SBS waterproof membrane, and overhead heat insulation panels.
3. Implementation of laws and regulations, including planning permits, bidding, supervision contracts, construction contract signings, construction licenses, etc.
4. All divisions and sub-items are assessed as qualified.
5. No quality or safety accidents occurred in this project.
6. The project archive materials have been inspected and accepted before completion and acceptance.
7. The environmental protection, fire protection and other departments have already conducted acceptance inspection before the completion acceptance, and the acceptance has passed.
2. Acceptance opinions of the design unit:
1. Since this project is an old foundation, the original planned settlement amount is 10CM. According to the reflected data, it is currently ideal.
2. This engineering drawing is based on structural design and has certain problems with current specifications.
3. Report on the completion quality acceptance of the construction unit:
See the completion quality acceptance report for details.
IV. The supervision unit shall summarize the supervision work and evaluate the completion quality:
For details, please refer to the supervision work summary and the completion quality supervision evaluation report.
5. On-site quality inspection:
1. Opinion of the design unit: Since this project is based on the original house structure, the clear height of the corridor at the carport level is insufficient and relatively narrow, and other lower works are required. Lessons learned.
2. Construction unit:
1) The quality basically meets the requirements, but the details need to be addressed.
2) Individual painted surfaces need to be treated.
3) The visual quality of water and electricity is relatively ideal.
4) The construction unit rectified the pre-acceptance problems quite satisfactorily.
5) The masonry sub-section of the assessment report is not comprehensive enough. The concrete test block report does not have the minimum strength and the data is incomplete.
6) Plastic steel door and window sill glass glue needs to be processed.
7) The railing paint is rough and needs to be treated.
8) The quality of the steel window glass grease is not good, so I need to replace it again.
3. The constructor and supervisor shall evaluate the project as qualified and humbly accept the acceptance opinions of experts from all parties.
4. Quality Supervision Station:
1) The installation project is ideal based on on-site acceptance.
2) The location of the manhole wind hooks on the roof is not good, and the look and feel of the skirting lines is not very ideal.
3) The corrugated tiles of the entrance and exit awnings are poorly designed and can easily fall and injure people.
4) There is sand on the floor of some buildings, which needs to be checked and dealt with.
5) Metal doors and windows are poorly painted and show through, and need to be dealt with.
6) It is recommended that the toilet stool pipe be sealed to prevent garbage from falling and odor from coming out.
Finally, the owner conducted a completion acceptance summary. The construction quality of this project was relatively good, and basically no defects were found45. crack phenomenon, the project was assessed as qualified. In response to the issues raised by experts from the quality supervision station, the construction party was required to implement and deal with them.
Supervision Co., Ltd.
20xx;