The family’s refusal to sign will not affect the procuratorate’s acceptance of the appraisal opinion. After all, prosecutors are not experts engaged in forensic appraisal work and can conduct procedural review of appraisal opinions.

It is unwise to refuse the visa. If you have objections to the autopsy report, you can apply for re-identification and supplementary identification. If you have any objections, you can also file a complaint to the superior department with jurisdiction in accordance with the "Measures for Handling Judicial Identification Complaints".

"Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on Issues Concerning the Management of Forensic Identifications" 10. For judicial identifications, the system of evaluator responsibility shall be implemented. The appraiser shall conduct the appraisal independently, be responsible for the appraisal opinions, and sign or seal the appraisal report. If multiple people participate in the appraisal, if they have different opinions on the appraisal opinions, they should be noted.

Any doubts about the appraisal opinion should be resolved during cross-examination. We should not give up signing or giving up cross-examination to solve the problem.

"General Principles of Forensic Authentication Procedures"

Article 28 Under any of the following circumstances, the judicial appraisal institution may conduct a supplementary appraisal at the request of the client:

(2) The client discovers that there are omissions in the entrusted appraisal matters;

(3) The client is in the appraisal process New identification materials are provided or supplemented;

(4) Other situations that require supplementary identification.

The supplementary appraisal is an integral part of the original entrusted appraisal.

Article 29 Under any of the following circumstances, a judicial appraisal institution may be entrusted to conduct a re-authentication:

(1) The original judicial appraisal person does not have the qualifications to engage in the appraisal practice of the original entrusted matter Qualifications;

(2) The original judicial appraisal institution organized appraisal beyond the registered business scope;

(3) The original judicial appraisal person should have recused himself in accordance with regulations and did not recuse himself;

(4) The client or other litigants have objections to the original identification opinion and can provide legal basis and reasonable reasons; (5) The law stipulates or the people's court deems that a re-identification is necessary Other circumstances.

The qualifications of the judicial appraisal institution that accepts the re-authentication commission should generally be higher than those of the originally entrusted forensic appraisal institution.

After the entrusted appraisal matters are completed in Article 32, the judicial appraisal agency may designate a special person to conduct an inspection on whether the implementation of the appraisal complies with the prescribed procedures and whether the technical standards and specifications are in compliance with the regulations. If upon review, any violation of the provisions of these General Principles is found, the judicial appraisal institution shall make corrections.

Article 33: For identification matters involving major cases or encountering particularly complex, difficult, or special technical problems, upon the entrustment of the judicial authority or with its consent, the competent department of judicial identification or the judicial identification industry shall An organization can organize multiple forensic appraisal agencies to conduct appraisals, and specific methods will be stipulated separately.