Evening News reporter Yan Lu Intern Zhang Zhidong
Xiao Ran said that on June 20th and1October 20th last year, at 265,438+0, she took the postgraduate examination in Taoliyuan test area of Henan Agricultural University, and applied for the civil and commercial law major of Henan University of Finance and Economics. "I remember very clearly that day, the whistle sounded at the end of the political examination, and the invigilator asked to put the test questions, answer sheets and answer sheets in the envelope together with the draft paper. I put these in the envelope and checked them specially. I confirmed that there was nothing on the desktop and handed it to the invigilator on the podium. "
"The invigilator took my envelope, looked at it and asked me to sign my name on the seal of the envelope. Then the teacher sealed it with glue and nailed it, and I went out of the examination room. "
"Agricultural University called and said I lost my answer sheet. I can't believe it. How is this possible? " On February 2 last year, Xiao Ran, who was in her hometown of Pingdingshan, suddenly received a phone call from Henan Agricultural University, saying that she had lost the answer sheet of the political examination paper. She rushed to Zhengzhou and got in touch with graduate department of the School of Finance and Economics. On February 4th, the teacher of Henan Agricultural University asked her to write two exam notes, and then asked her to wait for the results.
"If I hadn't lost my answer sheet, I would have been admitted."
The exam results came out. Apart from politics, Xiao Ran got a total score of 365,438+05 in the 2007 exam. The report card shows that her theoretical score is 24, while her objective score (answer sheet) is 0. Only then did I know that my answer sheet was not found. Xiao Ran shouted. She said that she was actually only 20 points away from the 335 points announced by the Ministry of Education. "If I hadn't lost my answer sheet, I would definitely be admitted to the School of Finance and Economics."
She also went back and forth to the test center of Henan Agricultural University, the Graduate Office of Henan University of Finance and Economics, and the Provincial Admissions Office to inquire. "The test center and the admissions unit all said that it was carried out in accordance with the document requirements and related procedures, and there would be no mistakes. The Provincial Admissions Office still has to wait and see. "
"I won't forget to put the answer sheet in the envelope and make such a low-level mistake ..." After Xiao Ran carefully "reviewed" that there was no problem, it suddenly occurred to her that the teacher of the test center and the teacher of the School of Finance and Economics asked her to write an envelope for signature. "They asked me if I had crossed my signature, and I saidno." Afterwards, she went to Agricultural University and School of Finance and Economics, and saw the envelope of her political test paper, and found that the signature on the envelope was "Only the last word of my name can be seen".
"It must be their carelessness and serious irresponsibility that made my answer sheet lost." Negotiations with these three institutions were inconclusive. Xiao Ran sued Henan Agricultural University, the school where she applied for the exam, Henan University of Finance and Economics and Henan Admissions Office, demanding that the three institutions compensate her for the registration fee for the 2007 postgraduate exam 1 15 yuan and the spiritual comfort of 30,000 yuan.
Provincial Admissions Office: There is nothing wrong with this exam.
Yesterday, all three units were agents in court, and all three stressed that this case was a dispute caused by postgraduate entrance examination, and the legal relationship should be administrative legal relationship. It is wrong for Xiao Ran to file a civil lawsuit. That is, the dispute between them is not a civil dispute, but an administrative dispute.
"Xiao Yan said that the three defendants treated the fate of the candidates as a child's play and were seriously irresponsible for their work. This is not true." The provincial admissions office said that they organized the examination in strict accordance with the procedures stipulated by the Ministry of Education. Proved by Henan Agricultural University and School of Finance and Economics, Xiao Ran did not put the answer sheet into the envelope of the test paper according to the procedure. According to the rules of the examination room, candidates should immediately stop answering questions, and put the test questions, answer sheets and answer sheets into the original test paper bag and seal them. The invigilator can leave the examination room only after checking and accepting one by one, and the test questions, answer sheets and draft paper are not allowed to be taken away. "Thus, the plaintiff Xiao Ran was at fault."
After finding that there is no answer sheet from Xiao Ran, the Provincial Admissions Office will promptly notify the staff of all relevant units to check in time and do their due diligence. There is nothing wrong with the provincial admissions office in organizing this exam and it should not be the defendant.
Test center: the test paper shall be executed according to the regulations from collection to return.
Candidates: The teacher didn't seal the test paper by himself as required.
"Agricultural University was entrusted by the Admissions Office to organize this exam without any fault." The agent of Agricultural University said that at the end of the political subject examination on June 20th, 2007, invigilator Chai specially reminded candidates to write their names and admission ticket numbers clearly on the test paper and answer sheet, and then filled them in and put them in the test paper bag.
"The examination papers are collected and returned in accordance with the regulations. The plaintiff did not have any evidence to prove that the loss of the answer sheet was caused by the intention or negligence of Agricultural University. " The agent said that because there is no evidence, it does not constitute an infringement of Xiao Ran and should not bear any responsibility.
Regarding Xiao Ran's statement that "the signature on the envelope of the test paper is ambiguous", Agricultural University explained that it is impossible for the invigilator not to be ambiguous if he applies glue and seals, so it is wrong to judge who has touched her answer sheet.
The entrusted agent submitted the testimony of Chai, the invigilator, to the court, proving that there was no abnormality between her and other invigilators.
The examinee said, "However, our test paper was bound by the invigilator that day, and the teacher sealed it for the students. The teacher did not seal the test paper by the candidates themselves as required. " Xiao Ran insisted that she came completely according to the requirements of the invigilator, and it was impossible to take the answer sheet out of the examination room. "If I want to say I have ulterior motives, I don't need to take the next exam."
Applicants: The examination paper storage system has been strictly implemented.
Candidate: The duty record is obviously suspected of forgery.
The School of Finance and Economics said that the school fulfilled its responsibilities in this entrance examination. The agent submitted to the court the patrol record of the examination paper confidentiality and the answer sheet storage room. "After receiving the answer card bags of the candidates who entered our college in 2007, we performed our duties carefully, successfully completed the security and confidentiality of the test papers, and made detailed work records. We also carefully searched the answer sheet problems found in the test paper bag at work. After confirming that there was no answer sheet, we made a detailed record and informed the test center where the candidates were located in time.
Li of the Graduate School of Finance and Economics said in his testimony: "1October 30th 65438+ 1 1, I opened the test paper and found no answer sheet. I checked the paper bag again and again, but I didn't find the answer sheet. I immediately reported to the two teachers at the scene. They also stopped work, checked the waste paper in every corner of the entire secret room, and then reflected the matter to Henan Agricultural University. "
The agent said that after finding that there was no answer sheet, the school immediately contacted the candidates' test center, made a detailed record, and reported it to the provincial admissions office for the record, fully fulfilling its duties.
Candidates said that "the duty record is obviously suspected of forgery." Xiao Ran's agent said that from the patrol records of the examination paper secrecy and answer sheet storage room submitted by the School of Finance and Economics, "the contents of the records of 65438+1 0.5 and 65438+10.6 are the same, but their signatures are inconsistent. They are all1person on duty, but according to the regulations, there should be two people. The records of 65438+1October 30th and 65438+February 5th have the same handwriting, and the three signatures are also the handwriting of one person. Moreover, in the record of 65438+1October 30, Li actually signed his name wrong and changed it after crossing it out. Isn't it wrong for a person to impersonate and forge the signatures of several people while on duty? "