Audited audio-visual materials can be used as evidence.
As long as the audio-visual materials, audio-visual recordings or videos are not distorted, captured and complete.
If it does not involve personal privacy, state secrets or business secrets, it is not illegal.
Excuse me, is it illegal to record conversations or telephone calls, and do I need my consent to record them? Can it be used as evidence? Article 1 16 of the Judicial Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law stipulates:
Audio-visual materials include audio-visual materials and video materials.
Electronic data refers to information formed or stored in electronic media by means of e-mail, electronic data exchange, online chat records, blogs, Weibo, SMS, electronic signature and domain name.
The provisions of electronic materials apply to audio and video materials stored in electronic media.
Therefore, recording a conversation or telephone conversation does not belong to eavesdropping and can be used as evidence. You don't need the other party's consent when recording.
Does unauthorized recording violate human rights? Recording without my consent does not involve human rights violations.
The so-called human rights refer to "the basic rights that people should enjoy". That is, the right to life, personal and political rights, economic rights, social rights, cultural rights, racial rights, equal rights, national self-determination, development rights, environmental rights and peace rights.
Is the office recording infringing? If it's your private office, it's not infringing. If the other party is interested in you, it is not infringement. As long as it does not violate the legitimate rights and interests of the recorded person, it does not violate the law.
Is the telephone recording infringing? Please, 3Q depends on the specific situation, whether it infringes the privacy of the other party or violates social morality.
Hope to adopt
Is it infringement to take photos of yourself without my consent? To be exact, first of all, it depends on whether the photographer is for profit. If it is not for profit, or even taking photos of myself without my consent, such as photos on social media, it is not an infringement of portrait rights; However, if it is for profit, such as a plastic surgery hospital taking photos of itself without my consent and using photos to attract customers, it should be an infringement of portrait rights. But I don't think this is an invasion of privacy.
Is it an infringement to be recorded without knowing it? You mean ... I don't know the situation. sever
Someone recorded the sound. Should I buy it as infringement? solid
There are clear provisions in the law. Is the other side right or wrong?
For the purpose of making money. Then he bought the infringement.
Is telephone recording legally efficient? Telephone recording is audio-visual material and legal evidence, which has legal effect, but it may not be obtained by illegal means.
According to Article 42 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), all facts that prove the true situation of a case are evidence.
Paragraph 4 of Article 53 When making documentary evidence and copies, taking photos and videos of material evidence and recording relevant evidence, there shall be no fewer than two producers. Copies, reproductions, photographs and audio-visual products that provide evidence shall be accompanied by a written description of the production process and a description of the original and its storage location, and shall be signed or sealed by the producer.
Article 61 It is strictly forbidden to collect evidence by illegal means. Witnesses' testimony, victim's statements and defendant's statements obtained by extorting a confession by torture or by illegal means such as threats, enticements and deception cannot be used as the basis for finalizing the case.
Is it illegal to install telephone recording on mobile phones? If installed on your own mobile phone, it is not illegal; If it is installed on someone else's mobile phone, it is suspected of violating privacy and breaking the law.
It depends on what the purpose is, whether the couple who install cameras at home are infringing without the consent of the other party. If you don't agree with anti-theft, but you must know, it's not a secret. This situation should be resolved through communication between the two parties and should not be infringement. If one party secretly installs a camera and does not let the other party know, it is infringement.