First, when you arrive at the executive court, the judge will not detain you for the first interview. You are just an economic dispute case, and you can't pay the money, which is different from the case that endangers public safety. Economic disputes belong to the category of private law, and the judge also acts as an old uncle and mediates between you and creditors. I hope you can carry out the verdict. Get this over with, and it's over. Second, the first interview is usually a negotiation, hoping that both parties can reach a repayment agreement. The judge will ask if you have paid it back, and you must not have paid it back. Then, you must have an attitude, such as installment payment. If the other party agrees, the judge will print out a negotiated text, and if you sign it, the matter will be over. What follows is what you have done. If you don't perform, the creditor will definitely urge the judge, and the judge will urge you. If the creditor doesn't urge the judge, the judge will not urge you. Generally, this is the case. Third, what circumstances will be detained? 1. You have assets, but you don't take them out to pay your debts. At the strong demand of creditors, the court asks you to auction your house. If you refuse, the court will detain you. 2. You really have no assets, nothing, and you haven't paid back, but the creditors are also stubborn, forcing the judge to urge you to pay. The judge, after several times, knows your real situation, but he can't resist the repeated persecution of creditors and has to say, then I'll detain him. What do you think? Therefore, the implementation of detention is all applied for and threatened by creditors, and the judge also completes the task. Otherwise, the judge is dereliction of duty and does not actively urge the creditors to complain about inaction. 3. In the face of the court, your bad attitude will greatly increase the chances of being detained. 4, you play missing, and you are under the control of the court. Once you are contacted by the police, you are waiting for direct detention, and there is nothing to say. Fourth, if you really have no money and the creditors are pressing hard, taking the initiative to be detained is also a trick. Creditors who push hard generally don't believe in your bankruptcy, so they force the judge to detain you. So at this time, you took the initiative to detain, so it took 15 days of criminal detention to resolve the pressure of judges and the distrust of creditors. It's normal that you lost money due to poor management or other legitimate reasons. There's no need to be as gross as committing a heinous crime. Not yet, just for the time being. I will work hard in the future and pay it back as soon as I have money. Therefore, the righteousness in the heart is still fundamental.