At present, the relevant provisions of our country's laws on "forging" facts are not perfect, and whether it constitutes a crime depends on the specific circumstances. For example, civil disputes are on the rise, and it is not uncommon for actors to maliciously forge evidence in civil proceedings with the intention of forcibly occupying other people's property through court decisions, which seriously infringes on the normal judicial activities and judicial order in China and has caused extremely bad influence in society. Without severe punishment, it is not enough to make the public angry. However, at present, China's criminal law does not explicitly stipulate the punishment for this kind of behavior, which leads to the inability to operate in judicial practice.

However, this phenomenon has attracted the attention and research of judicial workers, and many scholars have put forward many suggestions to the relevant legislative units in China, which I believe will be improved in the near future. However, if the forged signatures of board members cause significant economic losses, the relevant legal responsibilities should be investigated and corrected, and the specific analysis should be made according to different consequences.