In litigation law, judicial appraisal is generally used to identify the focus issues in dispute between the two parties at that time. Generally, the final appraisal issued by the judicial appraisal agency has an important impact on the court’s judgment. If the parties Those who think there are problems with the forensic identification can cross-examine, and the judicial identification cross-examination opinion is the court’s response to the cross-examination. The following is a brief introduction to the judicial identification cross-examination opinion. There are four legal articles in the "Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Litigation" (Fa Interpretation [2021] No. 33), namely Article 27, Article 28, Article 29 and Article 50 Kujo. The parties and their litigation agents should "carefully study" these four legal provisions before they can find out the problems in the appraisal and persuade the judge not to accept the untrue appraisal conclusion. Article 29 stipulates: “Judges shall examine whether the appraisal certificate issued by the appraiser contains the following contents: (1) The name of the client and the content of the entrusted appraisal; (2) The materials of the entrusted appraisal; (3) The appraisal The basis and the scientific and technical means used; (4) An explanation of the appraisal process; (5) A clear appraisal conclusion; (6) An explanation of the appraisal qualifications of the appraiser; (7) The signature and seal of the appraiser and the appraisal agency.