There are two types of transcripts: one is the interrogation transcript, and the other is the interrogation transcript. Interrogation transcripts are mainly written against criminal suspects, witnesses, victims, etc.; interrogation transcripts are only for criminal suspects. In both records, two police officers handling the case interviewed the criminal suspect (or witness, victim, etc.). First, they should show their police officer ID, introduce their identity, and inform the person being questioned of the witness's litigation rights and obligations or the notification of the witness's litigation rights and obligations. Notify the criminal suspect of the litigation rights and obligations, and then ask questions about the matter, requiring the criminal suspect to answer, record all the circumstances of the matter on paper in the form of one question and one answer, and hand it to the person being questioned or interrogated to see if he has told him the truth If the person being questioned or interrogating has no objection, he or she should sign "I have read the above transcript and it is consistent with what I said", press their thumbprint, and then the two police officers handling the case will sign separately.

Legal basis:

Article 198 of the "Regulations on Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs" When investigators interrogate a criminal suspect, they should first ask whether the criminal suspect has committed a crime behavior, and inform the criminal suspect of the legal provisions that may result in a lighter or reduced punishment if he truthfully confesses his crime, ask him to state the circumstances of his guilt or excuse his innocence, and then ask him questions. Criminal suspects should answer truthfully the questions raised by investigators. However, they have the right to refuse to answer questions that are irrelevant to this case.