To tell the truth, I support Thompson more. How did its team perform in these two games? To be honest, it's pathetic. He made six of fifteen shots and hit 38.7, which is seriously inconsistent with his status as a champion guard. However, some marketing numbers are still boasting unscrupulously. As long as Warriors fans are happy, as long as Curry fans are happy, they are all masters. Do you think it is efficient to vote 17 or 18 and only get 17 points, and get 1 points once? Isn't it efficient to hit 50% according to the number of shots? This calculation method is already discussing the true hit rate, which is only 50%. Do you think it's efficient?
Therefore, no matter which of Thompson's two games is abnormal, the Warriors are lucky not to lose all. But why can I support him? Because he is a shooter, Thompson, a shooter with an average of nearly 20 plus and an average of more than 20 plus, has an inherent feature that their state needs a huge amount of shooting rights to accumulate, that is, the number of shots is related to the state. No matter how low his shooting percentage is, Cole will give him more than ten shots every game. For a shooter, only by constantly shooting can he throw his state.
Therefore, Thompson's performance is often better, but it is doubtful whether the Warriors will take into account the record, because the season has entered the second half, and the final ranking will be decided at this time. If Thompson loses his ranking because he has to adjust his time, is it worth it? And many of the Warriors' perimeter players are doing well now. It is really a very difficult task to give Thompson this starting or substitute rotation quota. Reason, emotion and foresight are intertwined, but personally, I think the answer is clear. Without splash, you are not a soldier.