Current location - Quotes Website - Signature design - What's the difference between Nadal and Roddick's rackets?
What's the difference between Nadal and Roddick's rackets?
The following is my personal opinion.

Roddick's own racket is an additional version of "Babolat pure drive Roddick GT".

Nadal himself used "APD(Babolat AeroPro Drive GT)".

Neither of them is suitable for amateurs! ! !

The extended version of Roddick racket is 70cm. The longer the racket, the more violent it is and the harder it is to use. It weighs 332g.

The paint of PD Roddick GT is the same as that of Roddick's own racket, with signature on it. Length 69cm, normal length. It is difficult for a person who weighs 334g and is below "very strong" to play such a heavy professional racket.

Nadal's "APD" can be mastered by amateur tennis players in all aspects, but the special technique leads to APD playing rotation (topspin, chop, etc. ) easy. Horizontal rowing is very uncomfortable.

If you are not worried about the bottleneck of 3.0 advanced 4.0, you can choose APD. From the beginning, the improvement of spinning technology was very slow.

The source of these two rackets, PD(Babolat Pure Drive GT), was recommended to Moya. All aspects are suitable for amateurs.

In a word, PD Roddick is too heavy and APD tends to rotate. Recommend PD.

Note: I use PD, go up the spin route, and use APD very smoothly. Brother uses APD, and topspin is better than me. But other than that, almost everyone thinks APD is not easy. Moreover, PD Roddick has never been used, and L3 of 3 15g is too heavy for a "stronger" man, let alone 334g. Finally, PD and L3 are the first choice for amateurs. They have the most comprehensive performance and are more suitable for amateurs. No matter which direction you go, you won't worry about the racket.