It is out of the question. Signing insurance policies on behalf of others is a normal invalid contract, which has a self-evident impact on claims settlement. Don't be cheated. The law is about evidence, not empty words. In addition, universal insurance is not suitable. It is best to participate in marriage education insurance directly.

It can be used as medical insurance, education fund, pension, dividend, preventing currency depreciation and so on. That sounds really good. Assuming that there is such a panacea that can solve so many problems, then everyone can buy a universal insurance, and insurance companies don't have to make efforts to develop so many insurance products. If they can't get along with themselves, a company can do everything with a universal insurance.